The "Lifesaving Gear for Police Act of 2025" ensures state and local law enforcement agencies can access lifesaving federal equipment by preventing the enforcement of certain restrictive regulations unless approved by Congress and requiring the return of previously recalled equipment.
Pete Stauber
Representative
MN-8
The "Lifesaving Gear for Police Act of 2025" aims to enhance state and local law enforcement access to surplus federal equipment. It prevents the enforcement of certain regulations that restrict the transfer of federal property to law enforcement agencies unless approved by Congress. The Act also ensures that any property recalled or seized under these regulations is returned or replaced at no cost to the original agency, provided they meet specific requirements and intend to use the equipment for law enforcement purposes. Finally, the Act restricts the President's power to create executive orders that would limit equipment transfers to law enforcement.
This proposed legislation, the "Lifesaving Gear for Police Act of 2025," aims to make it easier for state and local police departments to get their hands on surplus federal equipment, including items from the Department of Defense. It specifically targets regulations put in place after May 15, 2015 (related to Executive Orders 13688 and 14074) that restricted these kinds of transfers. The bill says these regulations can't be enforced unless Congress explicitly passes them into law.
The core action here is preventing federal agencies from enforcing those specific post-2015 rules that limited what kind of federal gear—think surplus military equipment—could be sold, donated, or transferred to local cops. This effectively reopens the pipeline for equipment that previous executive actions tried to restrict. Furthermore, Section 2(a) ties the President's hands, preventing the reinstatement of those specific executive orders or similar ones concerning equipment transfers under the existing federal law (section 2576a of title 10, U.S. Code) that governs these programs.
Adding another layer, the bill requires that any equipment recalled or taken back from local agencies since May 15, 2015, under those now-blocked regulations must be returned or replaced at no cost. This is conditional, though. According to Section 2(b), the agency has to request it back, still meet the basic requirements for receiving such property under federal law, and the gear needs to be available and intended for law enforcement use. This could mean items previously deemed inappropriate for local policing under the restricted regulations might reappear in communities, provided the agency meets the baseline statutory criteria.
So, what does this mean on the ground? For police departments, particularly smaller or less-funded ones, this could provide access to potentially useful equipment—vehicles, protective gear, maybe even specialized tools—at little to no cost. The idea is to equip officers with "lifesaving" gear. However, the bill simultaneously removes a layer of regulatory oversight specifically designed to control the flow of military-grade equipment to local streets. By blocking the enforcement of post-2015 regulations (Section 2(a)), it raises questions about how the appropriateness of certain equipment transfers will be evaluated going forward, beyond the basic requirements of the underlying law (10 U.S.C. 2576a). Communities concerned about police militarization might see this as a step backward, potentially bringing equipment designed for warfare into neighborhood policing without the stricter guardrails those now-unenforceable regulations aimed to provide.