Prohibits schools from teaching or promoting gender ideology as defined in Executive Order 14168.
Clarence "Burgess" Owens
Representative
UT-4
The "Say No to Indoctrination Act" prohibits the teaching or promotion of gender ideology, as defined in Executive Order 14168, within educational programs covered by Section 8526 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.
A piece of legislation titled the "Say No to Indoctrination Act" proposes a significant change to federal education law. Specifically, it aims to amend Section 8526 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to prohibit the teaching or promotion of concepts defined as 'gender ideology'. The bill itself doesn't define this term, instead pointing to Section 2 of Executive Order 14168 for the definition.
The core of this bill lies in Section 2, which introduces the prohibition on teaching or promoting 'gender ideology' within the framework of the ESEA. The immediate challenge here is the definition itself. By referencing an external Executive Order (14168), the bill introduces a layer of complexity and potential ambiguity. Without the specific definition laid out in the bill text, educators and school districts might face uncertainty about exactly what content or discussions are permissible. This reliance on an external document could lead to varied interpretations and inconsistent application across different schools and districts operating under the ESEA.
The practical impact could be felt directly in classrooms. Teachers might find themselves navigating unclear boundaries regarding discussions on gender identity, LGBTQ+ history, or even student-initiated questions. For instance, could a history teacher discuss the role of gender identity in social movements? Could a health curriculum cover topics related to gender diversity? The lack of a clear, self-contained definition in the bill raises concerns about a potential chilling effect, where educators might avoid related topics altogether for fear of violating the prohibition. This could particularly affect LGBTQ+ students seeking information or support, potentially making school environments feel less inclusive or safe. The bill doesn't specify enforcement mechanisms, adding another layer of uncertainty for schools tasked with implementing this potential change.