PolicyBrief
H.R. 261
119th CongressJan 9th 2025
Undersea Cable Protection Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Undersea Cable Protection Act of 2025 prevents the need for additional authorization from the Secretary if a Federal or State agency has already authorized undersea fiber optic cables in national marine sanctuaries. It allows the Secretary to direct NOAA to engage in interagency cooperation regarding these cables.

Earl "Buddy" Carter
R

Earl "Buddy" Carter

Representative

GA-1

LEGISLATION

Undersea Cable Act Cuts Red Tape: Streamlines Fiber Optic Cable Approvals in Marine Sanctuaries

The Undersea Cable Protection Act of 2025 is all about making it easier to lay down fiber optic cables under the sea, specifically in national marine sanctuaries. Basically, if a federal or state agency has already given the green light for a cable, the Secretary overseeing these sanctuaries doesn't need to approve it again. The Act will come into force immediately upon becoming law.

Skipping the Double-Check

The core of this bill is about avoiding redundant paperwork. Section 2 says that once a cable project gets a permit from any federal or state authority, it bypasses further authorization from the Secretary. It's like getting one golden ticket that works everywhere, instead of needing a separate pass for each checkpoint. The goal here is to cut down on the bureaucratic hoops companies have to jump through.

Real-World Rollout

Imagine a company like "Oceanic Cables Inc." wanting to lay a new high-speed internet cable from California to Hawaii. If they get approval from, say, the California Coastal Commission, they won't need to go through another round of approvals with the Secretary overseeing marine sanctuaries. This could shave months off the project timeline, meaning faster internet upgrades for users in those areas. For a construction worker on the project, this might mean a quicker start and more continuous work, rather than waiting around for extra permits.

Potential Downsides

While streamlining sounds good, there's a catch. If the initial approval by a state or federal agency doesn’t fully consider the impact on a marine sanctuary, skipping the extra layer of review could mean less protection for these areas. It’s like having one security guard instead of two – quicker to get through, but potentially less thorough. Also, while the bill encourages different agencies to work together, it doesn’t exactly spell out how that cooperation should work, leaving room for things to slip through the cracks (Section 2).

Connecting the Dots

This Act fits into a broader push to modernize infrastructure and reduce regulatory burdens. It's similar to how some states have "one-stop-shop" permitting for construction projects, aiming to make things simpler and faster. However, it also raises questions about whether faster always means better, especially when it comes to protecting sensitive environments. The real test will be in how well different agencies coordinate and whether they prioritize speed over thorough environmental checks.