PolicyBrief
H.R. 2590
119th CongressApr 2nd 2025
Mental and Physical Health Care Comorbidities Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act establishes a Medicare demonstration program to test and share evidence-based models for integrating mental and physical health care, while also addressing the social determinants of health for vulnerable patients.

Brendan Boyle
D

Brendan Boyle

Representative

PA-2

LEGISLATION

New Medicare Pilot Program Launches 2025: Funds Hospitals to Treat Mental and Physical Health Together

The newly proposed Mental and Physical Health Care Comorbidities Act of 2025 is setting up a five-year pilot program under Medicare aimed at fixing a major gap in healthcare: the total separation of mental and physical health treatment. Starting October 1, 2025, and running through September 30, 2030, this bill tasks the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) with funding hospitals that want to figure out better ways to treat patients struggling with both issues at once, especially those who are low-income or uninsured.

The Real Problem: Healthcare in Silos

Right now, if you have diabetes (a physical illness) and depression (a mental illness)—a very common combination—your care is usually handled by two completely different systems that rarely talk to each other. This bill recognizes that this fragmented approach fails patients, particularly those who are already struggling with social factors like housing insecurity or lack of transportation. It aims to test integrated care models that treat the whole person.

Who Gets to Try the New Model?

This isn't a free-for-all; the program is targeting specific hospitals that already serve vulnerable populations. We're talking about eligible hospitals like rural hospitals with at least 35% low-income patients, or large teaching hospitals (over 200 beds) that meet similar criteria. The goal is to focus the innovation where it’s needed most. Crucially, the patients benefiting (applicable individuals) are those with both mental and physical health issues who are also enrolled in Medicaid, receiving Medicare Part D subsidies, or are uninsured.

If a hospital wants to participate, they have to submit a detailed, evidence-based plan to HHS. This plan must show how they will integrate care—maybe by putting mental health therapists right into the primary care clinic, or by using combined care teams. They also have to show how they will address Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). For example, a hospital might partner with a local food bank or housing non-profit to make sure a patient’s health plan includes resources for nutrition or stable housing, not just prescriptions. This is huge, as it acknowledges that medical care alone can't fix problems caused by poverty.

How the Money Works (And the Catch)

HHS will provide funding to participating hospitals through flexible payment structures, which could be a lump sum or a per-patient payment. Here’s the policy wonk detail: the bill allows the Secretary to set up payments that involve the hospital taking on some financial risk. This means if the hospital saves money and improves outcomes, they might keep some of the savings, but if they fail to meet quality goals, they might have to pay back some funds. This structure is designed to incentivize actual results, not just new paperwork.

However, there’s a key requirement: the hospital must promise these new efforts will supplement, not replace things they are already doing. The money has to pay for new innovation, not just cover existing costs. Auditing this separation could be tricky, and if a hospital breaches the agreement, they must return the funds.

Sharing the Homework: The Learning Collaborative

One of the most valuable parts of this bill is the creation of a learning collaborative. Think of this as a required study group for all the participating hospitals. They will meet regularly to share data, what worked, what didn't, and how they tackled specific social issues. After the five-year program ends, HHS has one year to compile a detailed report for Congress, outlining which innovations actually improved access, quality, and reduced overall costs (including public spending outside of healthcare). The entire point is to gather enough evidence to recommend permanent changes to Medicare and Medicaid policy based on real-world success.