This Act establishes an independent watchdog office to investigate and enforce compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws in college admissions and aid following the Supreme Court's ruling on race-based preferences.
David Taylor
Representative
OH-2
The College Admissions Accountability Act of 2025 establishes a new Special Inspector General (SIG) within the Department of Education to investigate allegations of unlawful racial discrimination in college admissions and financial aid. This office is created in response to the Supreme Court's ruling on race-conscious admissions and will review compliance with the 14th Amendment and Title VI. The SIG has the power to recommend corrective actions, including the loss of federal funding for non-compliant institutions.
The College Admissions Accountability Act of 2025 sets up a brand new, highly focused federal watchdog office with the power to investigate and potentially defund colleges that receive federal aid. Specifically, it establishes the Special Inspector General for Unlawful Discrimination in Higher Education (SIG) within the Department of Education, dedicating $25 million to its operations. The SIG’s job is to police whether colleges are violating the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act—essentially, checking if institutions are using race unlawfully in admissions, financial aid, or academic programs following the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against race-conscious admissions.
Think of the SIG as a specialized internal affairs unit for college admissions. This office, led by a Senate-confirmed appointee, is specifically tasked with investigating complaints from students and employees at any college that gets federal money (a “covered institution”). If you’re a student applying for a Pell Grant or a parent taking out federal loans, this applies to your school. The SIG has the full investigative powers of an Inspector General, meaning they can demand documents and testimony to determine if a college is trying to sneak race-based criteria back into its processes, even through subjective measures like application essays.
Here’s where it gets serious for students and institutions alike. The bill adds a new rule to the Higher Education Act: if the Secretary of Education finds that a college has discriminatory policies based on the SIG’s findings, that institution becomes ineligible for any federal student assistance or institutional aid. This isn't a slap on the wrist; it’s a financial nuclear option. For a student relying on federal loans, Pell Grants, or work-study programs to afford tuition, this means their school could suddenly lose the ability to participate in those programs, potentially cutting off their funding source entirely. For colleges, losing access to federal student aid is catastrophic, as it’s the primary source of revenue for many institutions.
The SIG isn't permanent—it’s designed to operate for 12 years—but its oversight is immediate and intense. The bill requires the SIG to report to Congress every three months, detailing every allegation received, the results of investigations, and, crucially, the compliance status of specific colleges. The SIG must publish data showing how many legitimate violations were found, broken down by institution, and whether those violations involved racial bias. If a college is flagged, it must either fix the problem or formally certify to Congress that no action is necessary. This constant, public scrutiny puts immense pressure on college administrators, who must now navigate complex constitutional law under the threat of losing their entire federal funding stream, which could lead to a chilling effect on any diversity initiatives that might be perceived as crossing the line.