PolicyBrief
H.R. 2569
119th CongressApr 1st 2025
Train Noise and Vibrations Reduction Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Train Noise and Vibrations Reduction Act of 2025 requires a report to Congress with recommendations for reducing train noise and vibrations near homes.

Eleanor Norton
D

Eleanor Norton

Representative

DC

LEGISLATION

New Bill Orders Federal Study on Reducing Train Noise and Vibrations Near Homes

This legislation, the "Train Noise and Vibrations Reduction Act of 2025," directs the U.S. Comptroller General – essentially the government's chief auditor – to investigate ways to cut down on the noise and shaking caused by trains near residential areas. The bill requires a report delivered to Congress within one year, outlining potential solutions and weighing their costs against their benefits.

Digging into the Details: What's Under Review?

The study isn't just a quick look; it's tasked with exploring a wide range of potential fixes. According to Section 2, this includes everything from physical changes like modifying trains and tracks, adjusting maintenance routines, and setting different speed limits, to operational tweaks like limiting the number of trains or cars, or restricting operating hours. It also covers mitigation strategies between the tracks and homes, such as barriers or buffer zones, requirements for building insulation in nearby homes, and even potential soil modifications to dampen vibrations. The goal is to get a comprehensive picture of what could work.

Weighing the Options: Costs, Benefits, and Who Pays?

A key part of this required report is the cost-benefit analysis for each recommendation. This means Congress won't just get a list of ideas, but also an estimate of what each fix might cost and how effective it could be at reducing noise and vibrations. This step aims to provide data for potential future decisions. It's worth noting that the cost of producing this report itself will be covered by taxpayers. While the report doesn't mandate any changes yet, its findings could eventually influence regulations or infrastructure spending, potentially impacting residents near tracks (positively, through noise reduction) and rail operators (potentially through new costs or operating rules).