PolicyBrief
H.R. 2567
119th CongressApr 1st 2025
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide special rules for purposes of determining if financial guaranty insurance companies are qualifying insurance corporations under the passive foreign investment company rules.
IN COMMITTEE

Amends tax rules to allow financial guaranty insurance companies to be treated as qualifying insurance corporations and not as passive foreign investment companies under certain conditions, and requires reporting by U.S. persons owning interests in certain foreign corporations.

Gwen Moore
D

Gwen Moore

Representative

WI-4

LEGISLATION

Tax Code Update Adjusts PFIC Rules for Financial Guaranty Insurers Starting After 2024

This bill modifies the Internal Revenue Code, specifically changing how financial guaranty insurance companies are treated under the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) rules. It sets new conditions allowing these specialized insurers to potentially avoid PFIC classification by adjusting how their liabilities are calculated for tax purposes, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.

Untangling Tax Rules for Specialized Insurers

Think of Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) rules as the IRS's way of preventing U.S. taxpayers from deferring tax on investment income held through foreign corporations. Usually, if a foreign company primarily holds passive assets or earns passive income, it gets tagged as a PFIC, triggering complex tax rules for its U.S. investors. However, this bill argues that financial guaranty insurers—companies whose main job is insuring bonds (like municipal bonds) or other financial products—don't fit neatly into this box. Their reserves look like passive assets on paper but are actually tied directly to their active insurance business.

To address this, the legislation allows these companies to count unearned premium reserves as part of their 'applicable insurance liabilities' when calculating if they meet the PFIC income or asset tests (Sec 1). This is a key change, as it better reflects the active nature of their reserves, potentially helping them avoid the PFIC label. But, there are strings attached.

The Fine Print: Exposure Ratios and Reporting

To qualify for this special treatment, a financial guaranty insurance company has to meet specific criteria outlined in the bill (Sec 1). This includes things like maintaining certain levels of 'financial guaranty exposure' (essentially, the ratio of insured debt to the company's assets) or 'state or local bond exposure.' These tests are designed to ensure only bona fide financial guaranty insurers benefit.

The bill also introduces a new reporting requirement (Sec 1). If you're a U.S. person holding an interest in certain non-publicly traded foreign corporations (specifically, ones that would be PFICs if not for exceptions like this one), you'll need to report information about that interest to the Treasury Secretary. This adds a compliance step for a specific group of investors.

What This Means in Practice

For the financial guaranty insurance industry, this legislation could provide significant relief from potentially burdensome PFIC tax rules, aligning the tax code more closely with their business model. This might make investing in such foreign-based insurers slightly less complicated for U.S. investors.

However, the new reporting requirement for U.S. owners of interests in certain non-publicly traded foreign entities adds a layer of paperwork, though likely affecting a relatively small number of taxpayers. Furthermore, the bill grants the Treasury Secretary authority to issue more guidance (Sec 1), meaning some details on how this all works out could still evolve. It's a targeted adjustment aimed at a specific niche within the insurance and finance world, set to take effect after 2024.