This bill establishes the position of Secretary of the Coast Guard, who will be appointed by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and report directly to the Secretary (of Homeland Security or Transportation, depending on operational status).
Mike Ezell
Representative
MS-4
The Secretary of the Coast Guard Act of 2025 establishes the new, Senate-confirmed position of Secretary of the Coast Guard. This new Cabinet-level official will report directly to the Secretary of Homeland Security, overseeing the service. The bill redefines leadership structure within Title 14 of the U.S. Code, placing the Commandant of the Coast Guard under the direction of this new Secretary.
The “Secretary of the Coast Guard Act of 2025” isn’t about buying new ships or changing search-and-rescue rules; it’s a pure administrative shake-up of the Coast Guard’s leadership structure. Essentially, this legislation carves out a brand-new, high-level civilian position—the Secretary of the Coast Guard—to sit between the current military head of the service and the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS).
Under Section 2 of this Act, the biggest change is the insertion of a new Section 201 into Title 14 of the U.S. Code, which establishes the Secretary of the Coast Guard. This isn't just a title change; this person will be appointed by the President and must be confirmed by the Senate. Think of it like this: currently, the Commandant (the four-star military officer leading the Coast Guard) reports up the chain within DHS. This bill creates a new, dedicated civilian layer of leadership specifically focused on the Coast Guard.
This new Secretary of the Coast Guard will report directly to the overarching Secretary (meaning the Secretary of DHS), bypassing any intermediate officials. This direct line, detailed in the new statutory language, is designed to give the Coast Guard a dedicated, Senate-confirmed advocate at the highest levels of the department. For the average person, this could mean better administrative focus on Coast Guard missions—from maintaining navigational aids that keep shipping lanes clear for consumer goods to ensuring better resourcing for disaster response missions.
The most significant operational change is the new reporting structure. The bill explicitly states that the Commandant of the Coast Guard—the service’s top military officer—must now report directly to this new Secretary of the Coast Guard. This is a classic governmental reorganization move: instead of the military leader having direct administrative oversight from the DHS Secretary’s staff, they now have a dedicated civilian boss. This change, while seemingly technical, shifts the balance of power and oversight. It means the military leader of the service will now answer to a civilian leader whose sole focus is the Coast Guard, rather than competing for the attention of the broader DHS Secretary who manages Customs, Border Patrol, FEMA, and more.
While you won’t notice this change when you see a Coast Guard cutter, the structural shift could affect how effectively the service operates. If the new Secretary is a strong administrator, the Coast Guard could see clearer priorities and better allocation of resources for everything from maintaining aging infrastructure to conducting critical search-and-rescue operations. On the flip side, adding a new layer of bureaucracy always carries the risk of slowing down decision-making, though the intent here seems to be streamlining the reporting line to the top. The bill also includes minor technical housekeeping, renumbering existing Section 106 to Section 107 to make room for the definition of the new role, ensuring the statute books are tidy.