PolicyBrief
H.R. 251
119th CongressJan 9th 2025
Legal Workforce Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Legal Workforce Act mandates employers to verify employees' work eligibility through a federal system, increases penalties for hiring unauthorized workers, and enhances measures to prevent fraud and misuse of documents. It also preempts state laws related to employment eligibility verification, while allowing states to enforce the federal regulations.

Ken Calvert
R

Ken Calvert

Representative

CA-41

LEGISLATION

Nationwide E-Verify Mandate: 'Legal Workforce Act' Requires All Employers to Use Federal System, Ramping Up Penalties

The 'Legal Workforce Act' is a sweeping overhaul of how businesses check if someone's legally allowed to work in the U.S. It mandates that every employer, regardless of size, use a federal electronic verification system (think E-Verify, but potentially expanded) to confirm new hires' work eligibility. This isn't a suggestion – it's the law, and it comes with some hefty changes.

Clock's Ticking: Rollout and Deadlines

The bill sets a phased rollout based on company size. Big corporations (10,000+ employees) have just six months to comply. Smaller businesses get more time, with those employing 1-19 people having a two-year window. Agricultural employers have the longest runway – 30 months. There's a possible one-time, six-month extension for the smallest businesses (50 or fewer employees), but that's it. (SEC. 2). The bill also requires reverification for employees whose work authorization expires. (SEC. 2). Even current government employees, and those with security clearances, must be verified within 6 months. (SEC. 2).

Show Me the Money: New Penalties and Paperwork

This is where things get serious. The bill significantly jacks up fines for knowingly hiring unauthorized workers. First-time offenses jump to $2,500-$5,000 per unauthorized employee. Repeat offenders face even steeper penalties, potentially reaching $25,000 per employee for a third offense. (SEC. 8). Even paperwork screw-ups get pricier, with maximum penalties soaring to $25,000. (SEC. 8). And if you don't use the verification system? That's treated the same as knowingly hiring someone unauthorized. (SEC. 8).

Real-World Radar: Who's Affected and How?

Imagine you're a small business owner – a restaurant, a construction company, a retail store. You're now required to use this federal system, navigate its procedures, and potentially deal with delays or errors. The bill does offer a 'good faith' defense, but it hinges on following the system's rules perfectly. (SEC. 5). For employees, this means providing your Social Security number or U.S. passport number, and potentially dealing with the stress of a 'tentative nonconfirmation' if there's a data mismatch. (SEC. 2, SEC. 3). It also opens up the door to potential privacy issues, as your information is now part of a massive federal database. (SEC. 3). The bill states it does not authorize a national ID card. (SEC. 3).

Verification System: The Heart of the Matter

The core of this bill is the mandated verification system. It's supposed to be fast (initial responses within 3 working days), reliable, and protect your privacy. (SEC. 3). But there are concerns. What if the system flags you incorrectly? You have a right to contest it, but that takes time and could delay your employment. (SEC. 3). The bill limits legal recourse for individuals harmed by errors in the system to the Federal Tort Claims Act, and prohibits class action lawsuits. (SEC. 3). The bill also includes provisions to try and block misused Social Security numbers and allow individuals (and parents) to 'lock' their SSN to prevent unauthorized use in the system. (SEC. 11). However, the potential for misuse of personal information collected is a significant concern.

States vs. Feds: Preemption Power Play

This bill doesn't just set federal rules; it overrides state laws regarding employment eligibility verification. (SEC. 6). States can still penalize businesses for not using the federal system, but they have to follow the federal rules and penalty structure. This is a major shift in power, centralizing control over immigration enforcement at the federal level.