This Act mandates a U.S. strategy to enhance nuclear energy cooperation with Europe to counter Russian dominance in the nuclear fuel supply chain and promote allied nuclear technology.
William Keating
Representative
MA-9
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025 aims to bolster U.S. and allied nuclear energy cooperation to counter Russia's global leverage over the nuclear fuel supply chain. The bill mandates the development of a comprehensive strategy to promote American and allied nuclear technology exports across Europe. Furthermore, it authorizes dedicated funding to support responsible nuclear programs and actively combat Russian influence in the region's energy sector.
This bill, officially titled The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025, is essentially a foreign policy power move aimed at Russia’s wallet and influence. It’s a direct response to Russia using its control over the nuclear fuel supply chain—everything from uranium enrichment to building reactors—as a geopolitical weapon, especially in Europe following the invasion of Ukraine. This bill says: no more.
The core of the Act is a mandate for the Secretary of State, working with the Department of Energy, to craft a comprehensive strategy within 120 days. This plan isn't just a suggestion; it must detail exactly how the U.S. and its allies will work to reduce and eventually eliminate Russia’s market share in Europe’s entire nuclear fuel cycle by specific deadlines, stretching from 2030 to 2050 (SEC. 4). Think of it as a detailed, multi-decade roadmap to energy independence for our allies.
For anyone in the U.S. nuclear industry, this bill is a massive green light. Section 3 lays out a clear preference hierarchy for countries looking to build new nuclear power programs: first choice must be U.S. products and services. If the U.S. can't supply it, the preference shifts to close allies like Canada, Japan, the U.K., and South Korea. However, there’s a key detail here: the allied preference only kicks in when those countries aren't directly competing with U.S. companies. This means the bill is designed to push American nuclear tech first, potentially giving U.S. manufacturers a significant leg up in the massive European energy transition market. For European nuclear companies, this could be a mixed bag; they are partners against Russia, but the U.S. is still prioritizing its own firms when contracts are up for grabs.
Strategies are nice, but they need cash. Section 5 authorizes $30 million annually for five years (FY 2025 through FY 2029)—a total of $150 million—specifically for European nuclear engagement. This money is earmarked for building responsible nuclear power programs, providing early support for new projects, and, interestingly, fighting Russian disinformation campaigns in the region. This is where the rubber meets the road: the funding provides the diplomatic and technical support needed to help countries replace their Russian-designed reactors and fuel sources with U.S. or allied alternatives, which often includes advanced technologies like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).
While this is a foreign policy bill, its real-world impact is about stability and costs. Russia's control over nuclear fuel and its willingness to weaponize energy (as seen in Ukraine) creates global market volatility. By diversifying the global nuclear supply chain and promoting secure, allied sources, the U.S. is aiming to stabilize energy markets in the long run. If you’re paying for electricity or dealing with the ripple effects of global energy shocks, this bill is an attempt to reduce the leverage of a hostile actor over a critical resource. The required analysis of technologies like High Assay Low Enriched Uranium (HALEU) (SEC. 6) also signals a push toward advanced fuels that could make future nuclear power generation safer and more efficient, potentially lowering long-term energy costs for everyone.