PolicyBrief
H.R. 2489
119th CongressMar 31st 2025
Hunger-Free Future Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "Hunger-Free Future Act of 2025" ensures updates to SNAP's food plan do not increase food insecurity.

Shontel Brown
D

Shontel Brown

Representative

OH-11

LEGISLATION

New SNAP Rule Proposed: Future Food Plan Changes Barred from Increasing Food Insecurity

This part of the Hunger-Free Future Act sets a new rule for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), often called food stamps. It specifically targets the "Thrifty Food Plan," which is the government's model for a basic, low-cost healthy diet and the foundation for setting SNAP benefit amounts. The core idea? Any future updates or recalculations of this plan cannot result in more households struggling to afford enough food.

Guarding the Grocery Budget

Think of the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) as the theoretical shopping list SNAP benefits are based on. Periodically, the government re-evaluates this list, potentially adjusting it based on current food prices, dietary guidelines, or consumption patterns. This bill introduces a critical safeguard: future re-evaluations are explicitly forbidden from increasing "food insecurity." In simple terms, changes to the plan shouldn't lead to more families lacking consistent access to enough food due to financial constraints. It aims to prevent updates from unintentionally reducing the adequacy of benefits.

Inflation Adjustments Stay Put

Beyond the new safeguard, the bill reinforces the status quo regarding cost adjustments. It mandates that the existing methods for adjusting the TFP to account for changes in food costs must continue as outlined in current law. This provision ensures that the baseline plan, and by extension SNAP benefits, continues to be updated to reflect changes in the cost of groceries, according to the established procedures.

Reading Between the Lines

While the intention to protect benefit levels seems clear, the practical impact could hinge on specifics not detailed in this section. The legislation doesn't define precisely how "food insecurity" increases will be measured in this context, nor does it alter the existing methodology for "cost adjustments," which some might argue already falls short of real-world price inflation. The effectiveness of this protective measure will depend significantly on how these terms are interpreted and applied during future TFP evaluations.