The "Hunger-Free Future Act of 2025" ensures updates to SNAP's food plan do not increase food insecurity.
Shontel Brown
Representative
OH-11
The "Hunger-Free Future Act of 2025" aims to prevent increases in food insecurity when the thrifty food plan is re-evaluated or updated within the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). It ensures that adjustments to the diet's cost continue as outlined in existing guidelines.
This part of the Hunger-Free Future Act sets a new rule for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), often called food stamps. It specifically targets the "Thrifty Food Plan," which is the government's model for a basic, low-cost healthy diet and the foundation for setting SNAP benefit amounts. The core idea? Any future updates or recalculations of this plan cannot result in more households struggling to afford enough food.
Think of the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) as the theoretical shopping list SNAP benefits are based on. Periodically, the government re-evaluates this list, potentially adjusting it based on current food prices, dietary guidelines, or consumption patterns. This bill introduces a critical safeguard: future re-evaluations are explicitly forbidden from increasing "food insecurity." In simple terms, changes to the plan shouldn't lead to more families lacking consistent access to enough food due to financial constraints. It aims to prevent updates from unintentionally reducing the adequacy of benefits.
Beyond the new safeguard, the bill reinforces the status quo regarding cost adjustments. It mandates that the existing methods for adjusting the TFP to account for changes in food costs must continue as outlined in current law. This provision ensures that the baseline plan, and by extension SNAP benefits, continues to be updated to reflect changes in the cost of groceries, according to the established procedures.
While the intention to protect benefit levels seems clear, the practical impact could hinge on specifics not detailed in this section. The legislation doesn't define precisely how "food insecurity" increases will be measured in this context, nor does it alter the existing methodology for "cost adjustments," which some might argue already falls short of real-world price inflation. The effectiveness of this protective measure will depend significantly on how these terms are interpreted and applied during future TFP evaluations.