This act mandates a GAO study on the feasibility and economic impact of using low-orbit satellites to expand broadband access in the Appalachian region.
David Taylor
Representative
OH-2
The Expanding Appalachia’s Broadband Access Act mandates a Government Accountability Office (GAO) study on utilizing low-orbit satellites to improve internet access across the Appalachian region. This investigation will assess the viability, economic impact, and cost-effectiveness of these satellite systems for supporting regional businesses and economic development. The findings will be reported directly to Congress.
The Expanding Appalachia’s Broadband Access Act isn't immediately stringing up fiber optic cables; instead, it starts with a key piece of homework. This bill mandates that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch a detailed study on using low-orbit satellite systems—think Starlink, but government-vetted—to bring better internet to the Appalachian region. Specifically, Section 2 requires the Comptroller General to kick off this investigation within 90 days of the bill becoming law, focusing on whether the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) should be using this tech in its broadband projects.
For folks living and working in Appalachia, reliable internet isn't a luxury; it's the foundation for everything from running a small business to remote work. This study hits three crucial points that matter to the average person. First, the GAO must look at how well these low-orbit satellite services actually support businesses—not just whether they provide a signal, but whether the speed and reliability are good enough for things like processing payments, running cloud software, or handling high-volume video calls. Second, they're checking the track record: is there documented economic growth in areas that have already adopted this kind of satellite broadband? This is about separating the hype from the hard numbers on job creation and investment.
The final piece of the study is perhaps the most critical for taxpayers and regional planners: cost-effectiveness. The GAO is tasked with analyzing whether using these satellite systems for economic development is a smart financial move. If the cost of deploying, maintaining, and subscribing to these systems outweighs the economic benefits they generate, then it’s not a worthwhile investment. This analysis is essentially the government checking the receipt before committing to a massive infrastructure purchase. Once the GAO finishes its deep dive, the full report—the good, the bad, and the expensive—gets sent straight to Congress, giving lawmakers the data they need to decide if satellite internet is the right path forward for the region.
While the bill is clear about starting the study within 90 days, it doesn't set a deadline for when the GAO has to finish and deliver the final report to Congress. This lack of a completion date is the one minor procedural speed bump here. For the small business owner waiting on a reliable connection to expand their online sales, or the student needing consistent access for remote learning, the information is vital, but the timeline for getting that information—and then acting on it—is still open-ended. Ultimately, this section is a necessary, fact-finding step that lays the groundwork for future, more substantial infrastructure investment, ensuring that any money spent on bridging the digital divide is done so based on solid data.