This bill prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from assigning its functions to Internal Revenue Service personnel unless the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration certifies that the IRS staff are adequately trained and the assignment will not interfere with the IRS's core tax administration duties.
Suzan DelBene
Representative
WA-1
The Protecting Taxpayer Resources Act restricts the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from assigning its functions to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) personnel. Before any such assignment can occur, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) must formally determine that the IRS staff are adequately trained and that the assignment will not interfere with the IRS's core tax administration mission. This determination must be published in the Federal Register to take effect.
The “Protecting Taxpayer Resources Act” is short, but it aims to put up a bureaucratic firewall between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Essentially, this bill says that DHS cannot just hand off one of its functions or duties to an IRS employee unless the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) first gives the green light. It’s an administrative check designed to protect the tax agency’s core mission.
For TIGTA to approve any inter-agency assignment, they have to check two boxes. First, they must confirm the IRS staff being assigned the DHS task are actually trained for it. Second, and more importantly, TIGTA must determine that taking on these extra duties won't interfere with the IRS's primary job: providing high-quality service to taxpayers and enforcing tax laws fairly. If TIGTA decides it’s okay, that decision only becomes official once it’s published in the Federal Register. TIGTA also gets the power to revoke that approval later if things change. This is all laid out in Section 2 of the bill.
Think of the IRS like a busy accountant during tax season. Their job is already complex. If DHS needs help—say, setting up a temporary checkpoint or assisting with some non-tax-related enforcement action—and pulls IRS staff away, that’s time and resources not spent processing returns, answering taxpayer questions, or auditing complex cases. For the average person, this bill is a safeguard against “mission creep.” It tries to ensure that the people paid to handle your taxes are actually focused on handling your taxes. If the IRS’s service suffers because staff are diverted, it can mean longer wait times for refunds or fewer resources dedicated to catching tax cheats, which ultimately impacts everyone.
While the goal is noble—protecting the IRS—the mechanism introduces a new bureaucratic hurdle. This bill essentially gives TIGTA significant gatekeeping power over inter-agency cooperation. The analysis of whether an assignment “will not interfere” with the IRS’s core mission (Section 2) is subjective, which gives TIGTA a lot of room to block assignments. For DHS, this could mean administrative delays if they need to temporarily utilize IRS resources for a legitimate purpose, perhaps during a localized emergency or a specific operation where federal personnel are needed quickly. While it protects tax services, it might slow down necessary government efficiency and coordination.