The MANAGER Act requires federal agencies to conduct annual surveys of managers to assess their confidence in disciplinary systems, training, and support within the workplace.
Pete Sessions
Representative
TX-17
The MANAGER Act requires federal agencies to conduct annual surveys of managers to assess their confidence in disciplinary systems, training, and workplace support. By gathering feedback on management challenges and morale, the bill aims to identify systemic barriers to effective personnel oversight. The Office of Personnel Management is tasked with implementing these survey requirements across all executive agencies.
The MANAGER Act is designed to pull back the curtain on what it’s actually like to lead a team within the federal government. By amending the National Defense Authorization Act of 2004, this bill requires every executive agency to conduct a mandatory annual survey specifically for managers at the GS-13 level or higher. Unlike generic HR surveys, this one is laser-focused on the friction points of government work: the ability to discipline underperformers, the quality of management training, and whether leadership actually has a supervisor's back when things get tough. Each of the ten required questions includes a space for narrative responses, giving managers a formal channel to vent or suggest improvements in their own words.
This isn't just a 'how are you feeling' exercise; it’s a deep dive into the mechanics of agency efficiency. For example, a manager at the Social Security Administration or a site supervisor at a federal construction project would be asked point-blank if they’ve avoided disciplining a problematic employee because they have 'no confidence in the system.' By forcing agencies to collect data on whether good employees are quitting because of 'problematic' coworkers—as specified in Section 2—the bill aims to pinpoint exactly where the bureaucratic gears are grinding. If you’ve ever worked in an office where one person drags down the whole team while leadership looks the other way, you’ll recognize the real-world problem this bill is trying to quantify.
The bill also addresses the 'sink or swim' mentality often found in high-pressure government roles. It specifically asks managers if they have enough time to observe new hires before their probationary periods end and if they feel they’ve received adequate training on how to handle disciplinary actions. For a mid-level manager juggling a heavy workload, this could be the difference between a functional team and a toxic one. By requiring the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to bake these surveys into official regulations within 180 days, the legislation ensures that this feedback loop becomes a permanent fixture of the federal workplace rather than a one-time suggestion.
While the bill provides a megaphone for those at the GS-13 level and above, it’s worth noting who might be left out. In many agencies, the 'boots on the ground' supervisors—those at the GS-11 or GS-12 levels—deal with the same disciplinary headaches but wouldn't be captured by this specific survey mandate. However, for those who are included, the bill creates a direct link between their daily frustrations and agency-wide policy. By asking if managers would actually recommend their job to a colleague, the survey forces a moment of honesty about the sustainability of public service leadership in today’s high-stress environment.