The White Oak Resilience Act establishes coalitions, pilot programs, and research initiatives across federal agencies to coordinate and fund the restoration, regeneration, and scientific study of white oak trees nationwide.
Garland "Andy" Barr
Representative
KY-6
The White Oak Resilience Act establishes a multi-agency effort to restore and conserve white oak populations across the United States. It creates the White Oak Restoration Initiative Coalition to coordinate federal, state, and private restoration efforts and recommend policy changes. The bill also mandates pilot projects by the Forest Service and the Department of the Interior, alongside a national plan to address tree nursery shortages and boost white oak research.
The newly proposed White Oak Resilience Act is basically a big, coordinated effort to save white oak trees—a crucial species for everything from wildlife habitat to the barrel industry. The bill sets up a series of temporary, seven-year programs across the federal government, aiming to coordinate restoration, boost research, and solve a major bottleneck: the national shortage of tree seedlings.
Section 3 establishes the White Oak Restoration Initiative Coalition, a voluntary group bringing together federal agencies, states, Tribes, local governments, and private groups. Think of this as the main steering committee. Their job isn't just to coordinate existing efforts; they are specifically tasked with recommending policy changes to the government. This means they will identify federal and state rules that are currently slowing down white oak restoration—like bureaucratic hurdles or outdated forest management policies—and suggest fixes. For a private landowner who wants to manage their forest better, this could eventually mean less red tape and clearer guidance on how to get help.
Sections 4 and 5 mandate the Department of Agriculture (through the Forest Service) and the Department of the Interior (DOI) to start five pilot restoration projects each. These are test runs to figure out the best ways to bring back white oaks on federal land, including national forests and DOI-managed sites like wildlife refuges. Crucially, the Forest Service must locate at least three of its five projects in national forests that were set aside a long time ago. This focus ensures that restoration efforts target diverse and potentially difficult-to-manage federal landscapes. Both the Forest Service and DOI are authorized to sign cooperative agreements with outside partners to get these projects done, essentially sharing the workload and expertise.
If you want to plant millions of trees, you need millions of seedlings, and right now, the country’s tree nurseries are struggling to keep up with demand. Section 7 tackles this head-on by requiring the Secretary of Agriculture to create a national plan within one year. This plan must figure out exactly where the seedling shortages are (by region and type) and identify the specific roadblocks—like lack of facilities or seed inventory gaps—that prevent nurseries (federal, state, Tribal, and private) from expanding. This is a big deal for anyone involved in reforestation, from large timber companies to small conservation groups, as a reliable supply of trees is essential for any planting goal.
Sections 6, 8, and 9 focus on outreach and science. Section 6 creates the White Oak and Upland Oak Habitat Regeneration Program and authorizes voluntary grants. Instead of having the government manage the grants directly, the bill requires the Secretary to sign an agreement with the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to run the program. This outsources the grant management, allowing the government to focus on technical assistance while leveraging the Foundation's existing infrastructure. The program is designed to help private landowners, who manage much of the white oak habitat, through technical know-how and financial support.
Meanwhile, Section 8 authorizes the USDA to partner with Tribal governments and land-grant colleges for research focused on making white oaks tougher. This research will look at genetics, better planting techniques, and how to match seeds to future climate conditions—a smart, long-term move to ensure these trees can survive the next few decades. All of these programs, including the formal USDA initiative in Section 9, are set to sunset after seven years, meaning Congress will have to reauthorize them if they want the work to continue. This temporary structure puts pressure on the agencies to deliver measurable results quickly.