The Remote Opioid Monitoring Act of 2025 requires a study on the effectiveness, cost savings, and accessibility of remote monitoring for individuals prescribed opioids.
Troy Balderson
Representative
OH-12
The Remote Opioid Monitoring Act of 2025 requires the Comptroller General to study and report on the use of remote monitoring technologies for individuals prescribed opioids. The study will evaluate the effectiveness, outcomes, and cost savings associated with remote monitoring compared to traditional methods. It will also explore ways to improve access to and coverage of remote monitoring services, and identify which patients would benefit most from this technology.
This bill isn't changing rules directly right now, but it's laying groundwork for potential future shifts in how opioid prescriptions are managed. The Remote Opioid Monitoring Act of 2025 tasks the Comptroller General – essentially the federal government's chief auditor – with conducting a comprehensive, 18-month study. The core mission? To dig into the effectiveness, outcomes, and costs associated with using remote technology to monitor individuals who are prescribed opioids.
The study mandated by Section 2 aims to answer some key questions: Does using tech like smart pill dispensers or wearable sensors to track opioid use actually lead to better patient outcomes compared to not using such monitoring? Does it save money for the healthcare system? The investigation will also look at how common this kind of tech is currently, both here and internationally. Think of it as a fact-finding mission to understand if these tools are just hype or if they offer real value in balancing necessary pain relief with the risks of opioid misuse.
Beyond just effectiveness, the report needs to recommend ways to improve access and coverage for remote monitoring, potentially suggesting changes to federal healthcare programs like Medicare or Medicaid. A crucial part of this involves identifying which specific types of patients might benefit most. Is it someone recovering from major surgery, managing chronic pain long-term, or perhaps someone with a history that puts them at higher risk? The findings could directly influence future decisions about whether insurance plans cover these technologies and for whom, potentially impacting how doctors prescribe and monitor opioids down the line.