This act establishes a statewide community eligibility option for schools to receive federal funding for free meals, provided the state covers any funding gaps.
Pete Aguilar
Representative
CA-33
The No Hungry Kids in Schools Act establishes a new statewide community eligibility option for schools starting July 1, 2025. This option allows states to ensure all schools receive full federal reimbursement for 100% of meals served by covering any funding gaps with non-federal money. By opting in, states can eliminate the minimum participation threshold and calculate eligibility based on the entire statewide student population.
This bill, titled the ‘No Hungry Kids in Schools Act,’ has one specific, powerful goal: making sure every kid in a participating state gets a free meal at school. Starting July 1, 2025, it sets up a brand new way for states to offer universal free school meals, removing the complex paperwork and income checks that usually come with federal meal programs.
Right now, schools use a program called Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) where they can offer free meals to everyone if a certain percentage of their students already qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. It’s complicated, and it forces schools to track eligibility data, which is a huge administrative headache. This bill cuts through all that by offering a Statewide Community Eligibility Option.
If a state opts into this plan, two major things happen. First, the old threshold for participation—the requirement that a minimum percentage of kids must be low-income—is dropped completely to zero. That’s the policy equivalent of hitting the easy button: every school in the state is now eligible. Second, instead of calculating the percentage of low-income students school by school, the state calculates this percentage across all applicable schools in the entire state. This means the state can use its overall poverty data to qualify every single school for the maximum federal reimbursement rate for every meal served.
This isn't a free lunch for the state government, though. The bill includes a crucial requirement: the state must agree to cover any funding gap using its own non-federal money. Why? Because the goal is to ensure that schools get the full federal reimbursement rate for 100% of the meals they serve. If the federal money doesn't fully cover that 100% reimbursement, the state has to write a check to make up the difference. This shifts the financial risk from individual school districts to the state budget, guaranteeing consistent funding for the program.
For parents and students, this is a massive simplification. If your state adopts this plan, your kid gets a free meal, period. No more filling out lengthy forms at the beginning of the school year to prove eligibility. For a working parent juggling two jobs, that's a reduction in administrative stress and a guaranteed cost saving. For the student, it eliminates the stigma that can be attached to using a free meal program, since every kid is eating for free.
For school administrators, the benefit is the huge reduction in overhead and paperwork. Instead of spending hours verifying income for thousands of families, they can focus on what they should be doing: running a kitchen and feeding kids. The primary challenge, however, will fall squarely on state legislatures. They must allocate enough state funding to reliably cover any shortfall in federal reimbursement. If the state’s commitment wavers, the whole system could be put at risk, potentially impacting school meal budgets down the line. This is a big policy win for reducing child hunger, but it requires a serious, long-term fiscal commitment from the state capital.