The Federal Employee Return to Work Act prohibits federal teleworkers from receiving annual pay adjustments and mandates that their basic pay be set to the "Rest of U.S." locality rate.
Dan Newhouse
Representative
WA-4
The Federal Employee Return to Work Act mandates that federal employees who telework at least one day per week are ineligible for annual pay adjustments. Additionally, the bill requires that these employees be compensated based on the "Rest of U.S." locality pay scale, regardless of their actual work location. Certain groups, including employees with disabilities and law enforcement officers, are exempt from these provisions.
The 'Federal Employee Return to Work Act' introduces a significant financial trade-off for federal employees who choose to work from home. Under Section 3, any federal civilian employee who teleworks at least one day per week—or 20% of their schedule—is immediately barred from receiving the standard annual pay adjustments that typically help salaries keep pace with inflation. This rule effectively freezes the base pay of a large portion of the modern workforce, though it carves out exceptions for active-duty military, law enforcement, foreign service members, and employees with disabilities receiving accommodations.
Beyond freezing annual raises, Section 4 of the bill fundamentally changes how a teleworker’s paycheck is calculated. Currently, federal pay is adjusted based on where you live to account for high costs in cities like San Francisco or D.C. This bill mandates that 'covered' teleworkers be paid according to the 'Rest of US' locality rate, which is the baseline pay for lower-cost rural areas. For a software developer or administrative specialist living in a high-cost metro area, this could mean an immediate and permanent reduction in their locality pay, regardless of where their physical office is located. Once an employee is classified as a teleworker, this lower pay rate is locked in and cannot be adjusted upward under standard locality pay authorities.
This legislation creates a stark 'pay-to-stay-home' reality. Imagine a mid-career analyst in Seattle who teleworks two days a week to save on commuting costs and manage childcare. Under this bill, they would not only lose their annual cost-of-living raise but would also see their locality pay dropped from the Seattle-specific rate to the much lower 'Rest of US' rate. To avoid this financial hit, that employee would have to return to the office full-time. The bill essentially uses compensation as a lever to discourage flexible work arrangements, forcing employees to choose between the convenience of telework and the stability of their current salary scale.
The changes are set to trigger on the first day of the first full fiscal year after the bill is enacted. Because the bill prohibits future adjustments for teleworkers (Section 4), the pay gap between office-bound employees and remote-capable employees would likely widen every year. While the bill might reduce government personnel spending, it places the entire financial burden on employees utilizing remote work. For the average federal worker juggling a mortgage and rising grocery bills, the 'Return to Work' act might more accurately be described as a 'Return to the Office' mandate backed by the threat of a shrinking paycheck.