This Act removes existing restrictions and clarifies eligibility requirements for striking workers seeking Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
Alma Adams
Representative
NC-12
The Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025 aims to clarify and simplify eligibility rules for striking workers seeking Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. This legislation removes outdated restrictions and clarifies the precise conditions under which participation in a labor strike affects a worker's SNAP eligibility. The goal is to streamline the existing law regarding striker access to food assistance.
The Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025 is aiming to remove a major financial hurdle for workers who participate in a labor strike. Simply put, this bill changes the rules so that workers who are on strike can access the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, if they qualify otherwise. It directly targets and removes an existing restriction (clause (iv) in the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008) that has historically blocked striking workers from receiving this essential aid.
For decades, federal law has included specific language that made it nearly impossible for workers who were legally striking to receive SNAP benefits. Imagine you’re a parent working a factory job, and your union calls a strike over unsafe working conditions. You’re fighting for better pay, but your paycheck stops immediately. Under the current system, you might not be able to use SNAP to feed your family during the dispute, even if your income has dropped to zero. This bill changes that by deleting the specific clause that created this restriction. For the worker on the picket line, this means the fight for fair wages doesn't have to mean choosing between rent and groceries.
Beyond just removing the restriction, the Act does some much-needed cleanup on the language defining ineligibility (SEC. 2). The existing law was a mess of confusing, conditional sentences—the kind of bureaucratic language that makes your eyes glaze over. The bill simplifies how the law describes when a striker does lose eligibility, making it clearer that the ineligibility is a direct result of being on strike, rather than some continuous condition. By removing a long, complicated proviso (that extra conditional clause), the bill streamlines the rule, which should make things easier for both the workers applying for aid and the state employees processing the applications.
This change matters most to workers and their families who are already living paycheck-to-paycheck. When negotiations break down and a strike begins, the financial strain is immediate and often devastating. This bill provides a temporary safety net, ensuring that basic needs like food can be met while workers exercise their right to collective bargaining. For example, a single parent who works as a warehouse packer and is striking for better health insurance can now apply for SNAP benefits to keep food on the table. This isn't a long-term solution to the strike, but it prevents the strike from becoming a humanitarian crisis for the worker's family. Since this bill is focused on removing barriers and clarifying existing rules, the implementation challenges appear low, and the immediate benefit to striking families is high.