PolicyBrief
H.R. 2341
119th CongressMar 25th 2025
Duplications of Benefits Victims Relief Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act grants the President the authority to waive the prohibition on receiving duplicate federal disaster assistance under certain conditions.

David Rouzer
R

David Rouzer

Representative

NC-7

LEGISLATION

Disaster Aid Bill Gives President 45 Days to Waive Anti-Duplication Rules for Victims

When a major disaster strikes, federal aid is supposed to help you rebuild. But often, the rules against getting 'duplicate benefits'—meaning you can’t get money from two different government programs for the same loss—can block victims from getting the full help they need. The Duplications of Benefits Victims Relief Act aims to fix that by creating a formal escape hatch from those strict rules.

This bill introduces a new power for the President to waive the ban on duplicate aid under the Stafford Act (specifically Section 312(b)). If a Governor requests it on behalf of an individual, business, or entity that suffered a loss in a major disaster, the President can grant the waiver. The catch is that the President has to decide it’s in the “public interest” and won’t lead to “waste, fraud, or abuse.” Crucially, they have to make that decision fast—within 45 days of receiving the Governor's request. This new waiver authority applies to any major disaster declared since January 1, 2016.

Cutting the Red Tape for Disaster Loans

One of the biggest headaches for disaster victims is that sometimes a low-interest federal loan—like one from the Small Business Administration (SBA)—gets counted as “duplicate aid,” reducing the grant money a victim can receive. This bill explicitly bans that. Under this act, the President cannot consider a loan to be a duplication of assistance, provided all the federal money is actually used to cover a loss caused by the disaster. Think of a small business owner who takes out an SBA loan to fix their roof immediately and then finds FEMA grant money later. This provision ensures the loan doesn't automatically reduce the grant, allowing the owner to use both to cover all their losses. Furthermore, when deciding on a waiver, the President is prohibited from using any income threshold to disqualify someone, meaning the focus stays on the disaster loss, not the applicant’s bank account.

The Trade-Off: Flexibility vs. Discretion

Giving the President the power to waive these rules adds much-needed flexibility to the disaster recovery process. This is good news for victims who have been stuck in bureaucratic limbo, unable to access critical funds because of overlapping program definitions. However, this flexibility comes with a trade-off: it grants significant discretionary power to the Executive Branch. The criteria for granting a waiver—such as “public interest” and “equity and good conscience”—are broad and subjective. While the bill aims to prevent waste and fraud, the vagueness of these terms means the decision is largely up to the President, which could potentially open the door for politically motivated or uneven aid distribution if not handled carefully.

FEMA’s Homework Assignment

Beyond the waiver authority, the bill tasks FEMA with a major administrative overhaul. The FEMA Administrator must coordinate with other federal agencies and report to Congress within one year on how to better deliver disaster assistance to individuals. This report needs to lay out clear steps for how agencies will work together, the order in which individuals receive aid, and how they will standardize the confusing definitions of “duplication of benefits” across all federal programs. For busy people, this is the administrative cleanup that could make the entire process less of a maze after the next storm hits. It’s a push for better government coordination, which, if successful, means less time spent filling out forms and more time spent rebuilding.