PolicyBrief
H.R. 2324
119th CongressMar 25th 2025
Unity through Service Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Unity through Service Act of 2025 establishes an Interagency Council to unify and expand recruitment efforts across military, national, and public service sectors while improving transition opportunities for participants.

Chrissy Houlahan
D

Chrissy Houlahan

Representative

PA-6

LEGISLATION

New Federal Council to Unify Military, AmeriCorps, and Government Job Recruitment Strategy

The Unity through Service Act of 2025 is basically a federal attempt to streamline the way the government asks people to serve—whether that’s in uniform, through a national service program like AmeriCorps, or as a civilian federal employee. Its main job is to create a brand-new high-level group, the Interagency Council on Service (Sec. 2), which will advise the President on how to expand and promote these opportunities nationwide. Think of it as creating a central strategy team for all things service recruitment, coordinating everyone from the Department of Defense to the Peace Corps.

The All-Star Team of Agency Heads

This isn't some low-level committee. The Council is packed with high-ranking officials from nearly every major federal department, including Defense, State, Education, Labor, and Homeland Security, plus the heads of the Peace Corps and the Selective Service System (Sec. 2). They’re required to meet at least quarterly. Their core mission is to set strategy, develop unified recruitment plans, and share best practices across the massive federal service landscape. They’re tasked with creating a comprehensive “Service Strategy” report every four years, which will review all federal service programs and suggest a unified message to get people interested in serving.

Sharing Data to Find Recruits

One of the most practical changes involves marketing. The bill explicitly allows the Department of Defense (DoD), the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS, which runs AmeriCorps), and the Peace Corps to team up on joint market research and advertising (Sec. 3). For you, this might mean seeing a single ad campaign that promotes joining the Navy, volunteering for AmeriCorps, and applying for a public service job all at once, rather than three separate campaigns. This is intended to cut down on redundant research costs and make sure these agencies aren't competing against each other for the same pool of potential talent. The bill even overrides certain existing regulations to make this information sharing easier, a detail that aims for efficiency but requires careful oversight.

Better Job Transition for Service Members

If you're currently in the military or finishing up a term with AmeriCorps, this bill tries to make your transition to civilian life smoother. The Department of Labor’s transition assistance programs for service members must now specifically include information about public service jobs and training on how federal hiring works (Sec. 4). Similarly, AmeriCorps participants will get information about military and public service jobs they qualify for. This is a clear win for anyone leaving service, as it opens up a clearer path to government careers, which often value the skills and discipline gained in service programs.

The Catch: Who Pays for the Strategy?

While creating a unified strategy sounds great, there’s a crucial detail in Section 8: No additional funds are authorized for this Act. This means that every agency involved—from the DoD staff preparing joint reports to the Education Department representative attending quarterly Council meetings—must absorb the costs of this new coordination and reporting using money that was already budgeted for other things. For the agencies, this means more work without a bigger budget, potentially straining existing resources or requiring them to pull funds from other programs to meet these new mandates.

The Report on Retention

In a nod to current events and ongoing debates about recruitment, the bill mandates a specific study within 270 days of enactment. The Council Chair must look at two things: the effectiveness of past recruitment campaigns and the impact of vaccine requirements on retention and recruitment across military, national, and public service (Sec. 6). This is a direct response to recent challenges faced by the armed forces and other federal agencies and ensures that future policy decisions are based on data about what actually drives people to join or leave service.

In short, this bill is less about creating new programs and more about organizing the existing ones. It’s a massive administrative effort to ensure the federal government is speaking with one voice when it asks citizens to serve, aiming for efficiency and a clearer pipeline into public service careers.