This bill establishes a commission to modernize the National Agricultural Statistics Service, aiming to improve data collection, reduce survey burden, and increase transparency in agricultural reporting.
Barry Moore
Representative
AL-1
This bill establishes the Commission on National Agricultural Statistics Service Modernization to improve the data collection and reporting processes of the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). The commission will identify ways to modernize NASS, improve data quality, accelerate the use of new technologies, and increase transparency. The commission will submit a report to the President and the Agriculture Committees of the House and Senate with recommendations for administrative, regulatory, and legislative changes. The bill authorizes $1,000,000 to carry out the provisions of the bill.
This bill kicks off a process to overhaul how the government collects agricultural statistics by establishing the Commission on National Agricultural Statistics Service Modernization. The main goal is to bring the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) – the folks who count crops, livestock, and farm economics – into the 21st century. It aims to improve data quality, use new tech to potentially reduce the number of surveys farmers have to deal with, boost producer response rates, and increase transparency. The commission gets a $1 million budget for fiscal year 2026 and has two years from the bill's enactment to deliver its recommendations.
Think about how much farming has changed – technology, specialty crops, regional variations. NASS data tries to keep up, but this bill suggests it's time for a dedicated look at making the system better. Key goals include getting more accurate stats that reflect differences across the country, using tech like real-time data to supplement or replace some surveys (which could mean less paperwork for farmers), and improving how data on specialty crops (like fruits, nuts, and vegetables) is gathered. Better data helps everyone from policymakers setting farm programs to businesses making decisions, and potentially even consumers understanding food supply dynamics.
The commission will have 11 members. It's a mix of government insiders – heads of NASS, the Economic Research Service, USDA's Chief Economist, the World Agricultural Outlook Board chair, and someone from the Bureau of Labor Statistics – plus six political appointees. Three will be chosen by the Senate Agriculture Committee and three by the House Agriculture Committee. They have about four months total (60 days for appointments, 60 days for the first meeting) to get started after the bill becomes law. Their job is to study NASS surveys, listen to farmers and other stakeholders, and figure out what administrative, regulatory, or legislative changes are needed.
If this works as planned, we could see more reliable and timely farm statistics, which is crucial for market stability and smart policy. Farmers might appreciate spending less time on surveys if new tech and methods are adopted effectively. Getting better data on specialty crops is also a specific plus mentioned in the bill. However, the commission's makeup, with a significant number of political appointees from the Ag Committees, raises questions about whose priorities might shape the recommendations. Will the focus be purely on efficiency and accuracy, or could certain industry interests gain more influence? The commission is tasked with gathering broad feedback, but ensuring all voices – from small organic farms to large conventional operations – are heard will be key. The commission operates until September 2030, giving it time to potentially see initial changes implemented.