PolicyBrief
H.R. 2270
119th CongressApr 9th 2025
Empowering Employer Child and Elder Care Solutions Act
AWAITING HOUSE

This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to exclude employer-provided child and dependent care services from overtime pay calculations.

Mark Messmer
R

Mark Messmer

Representative

IN-8

LEGISLATION

Bill Proposes Excluding Childcare Benefits from Overtime Pay Calculations

Alright, let's unpack the "Empowering Employer Child and Elder Care Solutions Act." In simple terms, this bill aims to change how overtime pay is figured out if your employer helps cover costs for childcare or taking care of dependents, like an elderly parent.

Specifically, it amends the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the big federal law governing wages and hours. The key change, found in Section 2, says that any money your employer pays directly or reimburses you for child or dependent care services won't count towards your "regular rate of pay" when calculating overtime.

Decoding Your Paycheck: The Overtime Twist

So, what's the "regular rate of pay"? It's not always just your hourly wage. Usually, it includes your base pay plus other compensation like bonuses or shift differentials. Overtime (anything over 40 hours a week for most workers) is paid at 1.5 times this regular rate. By excluding employer-paid care benefits from this calculation, the bill effectively lowers the base upon which time-and-a-half is calculated for employees receiving these specific benefits.

Imagine you earn $20/hour and work 45 hours. Your employer also provides a $100 weekly childcare subsidy. Currently, that $100 might be factored into your regular rate, slightly increasing your overtime pay. Under this bill, that $100 subsidy wouldn't be included in the overtime calculation, potentially meaning slightly less money in your pocket for those extra hours worked.

Why the Change? Potential Upsides and Downsides

The idea seems to be encouraging more employers to offer help with childcare or eldercare costs, perhaps by making it less complex or costly regarding overtime calculations. Offering these benefits could become more attractive if they don't inflate overtime expenses.

However, the flip side is the direct impact on workers who receive these benefits and work overtime. They could see a reduction in their overtime earnings compared to the current system. There's also a potential incentive shift: employers might lean towards offering these types of benefits, which under this bill wouldn't increase overtime costs, rather than providing straightforward wage increases that would factor into overtime pay. This could particularly affect workers in roles where overtime is common and whose budgets rely on that extra income.