The "Ranching Without Red Tape Act of 2025" streamlines the process for grazing permit holders to make minor range improvements on federal lands by requiring the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to respond to and expedite approval of such requests within 30 days.
Gabriel (Gabe) Vasquez
Representative
NM-2
The "Ranching Without Red Tape Act of 2025" streamlines the process for grazing permit holders to make minor range improvements on US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management lands. Permit holders can proceed with improvements to fences, water infrastructure, and stock tanks after notifying the relevant agency 30 days in advance, provided they receive approval or no response within that timeframe. The Act mandates the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to respond to range improvement requests within 30 days and expedite approved projects.
This bill, the Ranching Without Red Tape Act of 2025, aims to speed things up for ranchers holding grazing permits on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). It proposes a system where ranchers can make certain 'minor range improvements'—specifically, fixes or upgrades to existing fences, water infrastructure like wells and pipelines, and stock tanks—by notifying the relevant agency (USFS District Ranger or BLM State Director) 30 days in advance. If the agency approves or doesn't respond within that 30-day window, the rancher can proceed with the work.
The core idea here is efficiency. Instead of potentially longer waits for approval on basic upkeep, Sections 2 and 3 establish this 30-day notice and response requirement for both USFS and BLM lands. The agencies are mandated to respond within that timeframe and are encouraged to expedite approved projects. Think of a rancher needing to repair a section of fence quickly to keep cattle contained or fix a pipeline watering their stock – this bill intends to make that process faster.
While streamlining sounds good on paper, the practical details matter. The bill defines 'minor range improvement' fairly specifically to existing infrastructure. However, questions might arise about the scope – what constitutes an 'improvement' versus a simple repair? The expedited 30-day review period also raises considerations about agency capacity to thoroughly assess potential impacts, even for 'minor' projects, especially concerning water resources or local habitat. While aimed at reducing red tape for necessary maintenance, the faster timeline could potentially reduce opportunities for detailed environmental assessment or public observation compared to standard processes, placing more emphasis on the initial judgment call by the agency official within that short window.