PolicyBrief
H.R. 2238
119th CongressMar 18th 2025
Ranching Without Red Tape Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "Ranching Without Red Tape Act of 2025" streamlines the process for grazing permit holders to make minor range improvements on federal lands by requiring the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to respond to and expedite approval of such requests within 30 days.

Gabriel (Gabe) Vasquez
D

Gabriel (Gabe) Vasquez

Representative

NM-2

LEGISLATION

Bill Proposes 30-Day Approval Window for Ranchers' Minor Fixes on Federal Grazing Lands

This bill, the Ranching Without Red Tape Act of 2025, aims to speed things up for ranchers holding grazing permits on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). It proposes a system where ranchers can make certain 'minor range improvements'—specifically, fixes or upgrades to existing fences, water infrastructure like wells and pipelines, and stock tanks—by notifying the relevant agency (USFS District Ranger or BLM State Director) 30 days in advance. If the agency approves or doesn't respond within that 30-day window, the rancher can proceed with the work.

Cutting the Wait Time: How It Works

The core idea here is efficiency. Instead of potentially longer waits for approval on basic upkeep, Sections 2 and 3 establish this 30-day notice and response requirement for both USFS and BLM lands. The agencies are mandated to respond within that timeframe and are encouraged to expedite approved projects. Think of a rancher needing to repair a section of fence quickly to keep cattle contained or fix a pipeline watering their stock – this bill intends to make that process faster.

'Minor' Fixes, Potential Wrinkles

While streamlining sounds good on paper, the practical details matter. The bill defines 'minor range improvement' fairly specifically to existing infrastructure. However, questions might arise about the scope – what constitutes an 'improvement' versus a simple repair? The expedited 30-day review period also raises considerations about agency capacity to thoroughly assess potential impacts, even for 'minor' projects, especially concerning water resources or local habitat. While aimed at reducing red tape for necessary maintenance, the faster timeline could potentially reduce opportunities for detailed environmental assessment or public observation compared to standard processes, placing more emphasis on the initial judgment call by the agency official within that short window.