PolicyBrief
H.R. 2215
119th CongressJul 15th 2025
Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act
SIGNED

This bill officially renames the Salem Maritime National Historic Site to the Salem Maritime National Historical Park and mandates a study on expanding its boundaries to include related historical sites.

Seth Moulton
D

Seth Moulton

Representative

MA-6

PartyTotal VotesYesNoDid Not Vote
Republican
219182316
Democrat
213200013
LEGISLATION

Salem Maritime Site Gets a New Name and Kicks Off a 3-Year Expansion Study

This legislation, the Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act, is mostly about two things: an official name change and a mandate to look into expanding a historical park. First, the Salem Maritime National Historic Site is officially being renamed the Salem Maritime National Historical Park. It’s a simple administrative update, but it means that from now on, every federal document, map, and regulation referring to the old site name must automatically be updated to reflect the new "Park" designation (SEC. 2).

More Than a Name Change: The Boundary Study

The bigger move here is the requirement for the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a Boundary Study (SEC. 3). Think of this as the government hiring a consultant to figure out if the park should get bigger. The goal is to see if it makes sense to add new areas in and around Salem, Massachusetts, that are important to the area’s maritime history, coastal defenses, and military history. This specifically includes checking out the Salem Armory Visitor Center building and the park next to it.

For the Salem area, this study could be a big deal. If the park expands, it could mean more federal resources for preservation and potentially a boost to local tourism, which is the kind of detail that helps local businesses and job markets. However, the clock on this study doesn't start ticking until funding is available. Once the money is secured, the Secretary has three years to complete the study and deliver a full report, including recommendations, to the House and Senate committees that oversee natural resources. This contingency on funding means the timeline for any potential expansion is currently indefinite (SEC. 3).