The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act mandates that individuals registering to vote in federal elections must present documentary proof of U.S. citizenship.
Chip Roy
Representative
TX-21
The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE Act) significantly amends federal law to require individuals registering to vote in federal elections to present documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. This legislation mandates that states actively clean their voter rolls and cooperate with federal agencies to verify citizenship status. It establishes new criminal penalties for officials who fail to enforce these documentation requirements.
| Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Democrat | 213 | 4 | 208 | 1 |
Republican | 220 | 216 | 0 | 4 |
The newly proposed Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE Act) fundamentally redesigns how people register to vote in federal elections, effective immediately upon enactment. The core change is simple but massive: anyone registering must now physically present specific, documentary proof that they are a U.S. citizen at the time of application. No proof, no registration. This applies to every method, whether you’re signing up at the DMV, mailing in a form, or registering on Election Day.
Under this bill (Sec. 2), the days of simply checking a box confirming citizenship under penalty of perjury are over. Now, you have to show the paperwork. Acceptable documents are narrow and specific, including a valid U.S. passport, a Naturalization Certificate, or a REAL ID marked as proof of citizenship. If you’re using a certified birth certificate, it has to meet strict criteria, and you might need to pair it with a government-issued photo ID showing your U.S. birthplace. Think of it like applying for a new passport, but you have to do it every time you register to vote or update your registration.
This proof requirement creates a significant logistical challenge, especially for those who rely on convenience. Take the national mail-in voter registration form: the bill states you cannot be registered unless you physically bring your documentary proof of citizenship to an election official by the state’s deadline. For a busy person who just moved and works two jobs, relying on the mail to register from home is no longer possible. You now have to take time off work, track down the required documents, and make a separate trip to the election office just to complete the process. This disproportionately affects voters in rural areas or those who frequently move and might not have immediate access to their original birth certificates or passports.
The SAVE Act doesn't just tighten the front end; it mandates a massive cleanup of existing voter rolls (Sec. 2). States must establish a program within 30 days to actively identify and remove non-citizens from federal voting lists. They are required to use data from federal sources, like the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) SAVE program or the Social Security Administration. If a state official requests information to verify citizenship, federal agencies must cough up that data within 24 hours, free of charge. If DHS confirms someone already on the rolls is not a citizen, the state must remove them immediately.
This puts election officials—already dealing with tight budgets and staffing—under intense pressure and a tight clock. They are now responsible for cross-referencing massive federal databases, a process prone to errors if names or dates don't match perfectly. If they accidentally remove a citizen, that person has to fight to get back on the rolls. If they fail to remove a non-citizen, the bill introduces new criminal penalties for election employees who process a registration without the required proof, essentially putting officials in a legal vise.
Perhaps the biggest administrative shake-up is the creation of a private right of action (Sec. 2). This means that any citizen can now sue election officials or agencies for violating the terms of this Act—specifically, for registering someone who failed to provide the required documentary proof. This opens the door wide for constant litigation against election administrators, turning every procedural mistake into a potential lawsuit. For the election office manager simply trying to process applications, this threat of criminal charges and civil lawsuits could chill their willingness to process registrations quickly or efficiently, adding layers of caution and bureaucracy to an already time-sensitive process.