The "Strengthening State and Local Efforts to Counter Transnational Repression Act" enhances law enforcement training and coordination to combat transnational repression activities targeting individuals in the U.S.
Seth Magaziner
Representative
RI-2
The "Strengthening State and Local Efforts to Counter Transnational Repression Act" amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to bolster law enforcement's ability to counter transnational repression and related terrorism threats. It mandates the development of a training program for state, local, and tribal law enforcement to identify, record, and share information on transnational repression, as well as to protect potential targets and victims. The Act also calls for research and development of technology to enhance participation in these training programs and requires a report to Congress on its implementation. Transnational repression is defined as actions by a foreign government or its agents intended to coerce, harass, or threaten individuals in the U.S.
The "Strengthening State and Local Efforts to Counter Transnational Repression Act" (SEC. 1) is basically about getting local and state law enforcement up to speed on dealing with foreign governments trying to intimidate or silence people in the U.S. It adds a new section (890E) to the Homeland Security Act of 2002, specifically focused on this issue of "transnational repression." (SEC. 2)
The core of the bill is a new training program for state, local, tribal, campus, and even territorial law enforcement. This includes the folks working in the National Network of Fusion Centers. The training, run by the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (or similar), is designed to help them:
This is where it gets interesting. The bill defines "transnational repression" (SEC. 2) as actions by a foreign government (or someone working for them) to:
All of this has to happen in the U.S., or be directed at someone who is a U.S. person.
The bill also pushes for research and development of technology to make this training more accessible and improve how different levels of law enforcement work together to deal with these threats. It requires coordination between the Under Secretary for Science and Technology and the Assistant Secretary for State and Local Law Enforcement. (SEC. 2)
Finally, the bill requires the Comptroller General to report back to Congress within two years on how all of this is being implemented (SEC. 2). Think of it as a check-in to see if the training is actually happening and if it's working.
While the goal is to protect people from genuine threats, the broad definition of "transnational repression" could be a double-edged sword. For example, if an activist group is highly critical of a foreign government's policies, could their activities be misconstrued as being influenced by a foreign power, leading to unnecessary scrutiny? Similarly, the information-sharing aspect could be a concern if it leads to profiling of certain communities. The bill's success will really depend on how these definitions are applied in practice, and whether the training emphasizes protecting civil liberties alongside national security.