This bill establishes a temporary, capped tax credit for businesses investing in translational research for neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric conditions, prioritizing scientifically meritorious projects and public-private partnerships.
Mike Thompson
Representative
CA-4
The Mental Health Research Accelerator Act of 2025 establishes a new 25% tax credit for businesses investing in translational research for neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric conditions. This credit is subject to annual spending caps and allocation rules prioritizing scientific merit and public-private partnerships. The goal is to accelerate the development of new treatments and devices for central nervous system disorders.
The Mental Health Research Accelerator Act of 2025 is basically a massive, targeted tax break designed to turbocharge research into mental health and brain diseases. Specifically, Section 2 creates a new Translational Research Tax Credit offering companies a 25% credit on the money they spend researching psychiatric conditions and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s. This is a significant incentive—imagine getting a quarter of your research costs back against your tax bill—and it’s aimed directly at bringing new treatments from the lab bench to the pharmacy shelf. The government is clearly trying to use the tax code to push innovation where it’s desperately needed.
Here’s where things get competitive. This isn’t an unlimited pot of money. The government has put a hard cap on how much of this credit can be claimed nationally each year. It starts at $1 billion in 2026, jumps to $2 billion annually from 2027 through 2030, and then drops back down to $1 billion in 2031. For the companies doing the research, this creates a “race to apply” situation. If you’re a mid-sized biotech firm, you might have a brilliant, scientifically sound project, but if the massive pharmaceutical companies apply first and hit that $2 billion ceiling, you’re out of luck for the year. This annual cap (Section 2) means that even meritorious projects could be sidelined simply because the national budget for the tax break ran out.
To manage this limited resource, the Treasury Secretary has to set up rules for allocating the credit, prioritizing a few things. First, projects must be judged on their scientific merit and cover all phases of the research process. Second, there’s a special emphasis on public-private partnerships—think a university working with a private drug developer—especially those that involve sharing intellectual property. This is a smart move designed to get academic breakthroughs into the commercial pipeline faster. Crucially, the bill allows tax-exempt entities (like universities) to pass the entire 25% credit directly to their private sector partners, making those partnerships even more attractive to businesses.
If you’re a company that already claims the existing general Research & Development (R&D) tax credit (Section 41), you need to pay close attention. The bill is clear: you cannot use the exact same expenses to claim both the new 25% translational research credit and the existing R&D credit (Section 45BB). You have to pick one. Even more complicated, if you use expenses to claim this new credit, you are also prohibited from taking a standard tax deduction on that portion of the expense. For a CFO, this means careful calculation is required to figure out which credit offers the best overall tax savings, as you can’t stack the benefits. This limitation ensures the government only subsidizes the expense once, but it also reduces the overall financial incentive compared to if both the credit and the deduction were available.