PolicyBrief
H.R. 2083
119th CongressMar 11th 2025
Veterans First Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "Veterans First Act of 2025" allocates $2 billion to improve state veterans' care facilities by rescinding funds from the United States Agency for International Development.

David Taylor
R

David Taylor

Representative

OH-2

LEGISLATION

Veterans First Act Proposes $2 Billion for State Vets Homes, Shifts Funds from USAID

The Veterans First Act of 2025 includes a provision, Section 2, dedicating a significant chunk of change – $2 billion – specifically for grants to states. The goal? To help build new state veterans' homes or give existing ones, like nursing homes and domiciliary facilities, a much-needed facelift. This funding doesn't just appear out of thin air; it's offset by pulling the same amount, $2 billion, from previously allocated but unspent funds designated for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Building Up Care Facilities

This $2 billion injection is earmarked for the Department of Veterans Affairs to distribute as grants. States can apply for this money to undertake construction or major renovation projects for facilities that provide long-term care to veterans. Think updated medical equipment, expanded capacity, or even entirely new buildings designed to meet modern care standards. A key detail from the bill text is that this money remains available until it's spent, meaning there isn't a strict deadline forcing states to rush projects or risk losing the funds.

The Funding Shuffle: USAID Offset

So, where does the money come from? The bill specifies rescinding, or taking back, $2 billion from unobligated funds within USAID. USAID is the primary U.S. government agency responsible for administering civilian foreign aid and development assistance. This means money that could have gone towards international development projects will instead be redirected domestically to support state-level veteran care infrastructure. It represents a direct shift in funding priorities, boosting resources for veterans' facilities by reducing the pool available for foreign aid initiatives.

Real-World Ripple Effects

For veterans needing long-term care, this could eventually mean access to better-equipped or more numerous state-run facilities, potentially reducing wait times or improving the quality of life within those homes. For states, it offers a potential financial boost to address infrastructure needs for their veteran populations, which can be costly. However, the direct consequence of the funding mechanism is a $2 billion reduction in resources available for USAID's international programs. The effectiveness hinges on efficient grant allocation by the VA and proper management by the states receiving the funds to ensure the money translates into tangible improvements for veterans.