Mandates that 100% of cargo procured, furnished, or financed by the U.S. Department of Transportation be transported on U.S.-flagged ships, ensuring fair participation of U.S. commercial vessels.
Salud Carbajal
Representative
CA-24
The American Cargo for American Ships Act requires that 100% of the gross tonnage of equipment, materials, or commodities that are directly procured, contracted, or financed by the Department of Transportation be transported on privately-owned U.S. commercial vessels, ensuring fair participation of U.S. vessels in government-related cargo transport. This requirement applies if these vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates.
Alright, let's break down the "American Cargo for American Ships Act." In simple terms, this bill changes the rules for stuff the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) buys or pays to ship overseas. It mandates that all equipment, materials, or commodities procured, contracted, or financed directly by the DOT must be transported on commercial ships owned by U.S. companies.
Full Steam Ahead for U.S. Ships?
The core of this is Section 2, which amends existing maritime law (specifically, 46 U.S. Code § 55305). It sets a strict 100% requirement: if the DOT is footing the bill for shipping cargo across oceans, that cargo must travel on privately-owned U.S.-flagged vessels. Think materials for infrastructure projects or other goods the government finances for transport. The goal stated is to ensure U.S. ships get a fair shot at carrying this government-related cargo across different global routes.
The Fine Print: "Fair and Reasonable" Rates
Now, here’s the catch, and it's a potentially big one. This 100% mandate only applies if these U.S. ships are available at "fair and reasonable rates." The bill doesn't define what that means. Who decides if a rate is fair and reasonable? What happens if U.S. ships cost significantly more than foreign competitors, or if there aren't enough available when needed? This could mean potential cost increases for government projects (paid for by taxpayer dollars) or delays if finding a qualifying U.S. vessel proves difficult. While boosting the U.S. maritime industry is the clear aim, the practicalities of cost and availability, tied up in that "fair and reasonable" clause, will be crucial to watch as this plays out.