The "Red Light Act" withholds federal highway funds from states that provide driver's licenses or identification cards to undocumented immigrants, redirecting those funds to states without such policies. States can regain access to the funds by repealing the law, but funds will be withheld again if the law is re-enacted.
Claudia Tenney
Representative
NY-24
The "Red Light Act" withholds federal highway funds from states that provide driver's licenses or identification cards to undocumented immigrants. Funds will be withheld each year and redistributed to states in compliance if the non-compliant state does not repeal the law. If a state repeals and then re-enacts the law, funds will be withheld again. "Identification card" is defined as a personal identification card issued by a state.
The "Red Light Act" aims to withhold all federal highway funds from states that issue driver's licenses or identification cards to undocumented immigrants. Starting in 2023, this bill puts states in a tough spot: comply with federal demands or lose crucial funding for roads and infrastructure.
The core of the Red Light Act is simple: states that allow undocumented immigrants to get driver's licenses or state IDs will lose their federal highway money, specifically funds allocated under sections 104(b)(1), 104(b)(3), and 104(b)(4) of title 23, United States Code. That's a big chunk of change many states rely on for maintaining and improving their roads. If a state wants the money back, they have until the end of the fiscal year to repeal any laws allowing undocumented immigrants to get these documents. If they don't, that money gets divided up among the states that do follow the federal line.
Imagine you're running a small trucking company in a state that currently issues licenses to undocumented immigrants. If your state loses federal highway funds, road maintenance might suffer, leading to more wear and tear on your vehicles and potential delays. Or, say you're a construction worker on a major highway project. Loss of funding could mean project delays or even job losses. It is important to note that this bill defines "identification card" as a personal identification card issued by a state, as defined in section 1028(d) of title 18, United States Code, so there is no ambiguity about what is meant.
Section 2 of the bill also creates a loophole. A state could repeal its law, get the federal funds, and then re-enact the law, only to face the same penalty in the following fiscal year. This could create a cycle of legal changes and funding uncertainty. The bill doesn't have any way to deal with this repeated action.
This bill raises serious questions about federal versus state power. While the federal government controls the purse strings, states have traditionally had the authority to set their own licensing rules. The Red Light Act forces a showdown on this issue, with potentially significant consequences for state budgets, infrastructure projects, and the lives of undocumented immigrants. It also touches on the broader debate about immigration policy and how it intersects with everyday practicalities like driving and identification.