PolicyBrief
H.R. 2026
119th CongressMar 11th 2025
Ending Major Borderland Environmental Ruin from Wildfires (EMBER) Act
IN COMMITTEE

The EMBER Act establishes a Southern Border Fuels Management Initiative to reduce wildfire risk and improve border security on federal lands, while also mandating policies and reporting to mitigate environmental damage caused by illegal immigration.

Ken Calvert
R

Ken Calvert

Representative

CA-41

LEGISLATION

Border Wildfire Bill Funds $3.6M Fuels Management Initiative and Mandates New Environmental Cleanup Policies

The newly proposed Ending Major Borderland Environmental Ruin from Wildfires (EMBER) Act is a dual-focused bill targeting both wildfire prevention and environmental damage along the U.S.-Mexico border. Simply put, it establishes a dedicated, funded program to manage vegetation and prevent fires on federal lands near the Southern Border, and it mandates that federal agencies create new policies to clean up and prevent environmental harm attributed to people crossing the border without authorization.

The $3.6 Million Plan to Stop Wildfires

Section 3 of the EMBER Act sets up the Southern Border Fuels Management Initiative. This is a seven-year program, running from Fiscal Year 2026 through 2032, authorized to receive $3,660,000 annually. The goal is straightforward: reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires, make the landscape more resilient, and clear sight lines for law enforcement. The Department of the Interior is tasked with executing this, which means they’ll be focusing on reducing dry, dangerous vegetation (fuel), dealing with invasive plants, and installing physical fuel breaks—essentially clear-cut barriers to stop fires from spreading—on federal lands right next to the border.

Think of this as a major landscaping project with a public safety angle. If you live or work near these federal lands, this bill means proactive management is coming to reduce the risk of a massive wildfire that could threaten homes or businesses. For Border Patrol agents, the cleared sight lines are intended to make their jobs safer and more effective. The flip side is that this level of vegetation removal and barrier installation could significantly change the visual and ecological character of these border areas, which is a concern for environmental groups.

Who Cleans Up the Mess? Policy Meets Border Enforcement

Section 4 introduces a significant new requirement: federal agencies must create and implement policies specifically designed to stop, avoid, or reduce wildfires and environmental damage caused by people crossing the border illegally. This moves beyond just fire prevention and into active cleanup and damage mitigation. The policies must address everything from trash buildup in fragile ecosystems to protecting water sources, wildlife habitats, and archeological sites.

This section is where the policy gets complicated. It forces a direct link between environmental management and immigration enforcement. For taxpayers, this means federal agencies will be dedicating resources—funded by the authorized dollars—to cleanup efforts. The bill also mandates detailed annual reports to Congress, cataloging every reported incident of environmental damage or wildfire attributed to undocumented immigrants. This includes how many acres burned, where the damage occurred, and, critically, an estimate of the cost to clean up or fix the damage. This level of granular reporting aims for accountability but also puts a highly specific metric on environmental impacts tied to border crossings.

The Fine Print: Who’s Included and Who Isn’t

One detail that matters is the definition of “Covered Federal Lands.” While it includes lands managed by the National Park Service, BLM, and the Forest Service near the border, it explicitly excludes “any federal land held in trust specifically for Indian Tribes.” This distinction means that while the federal government is pouring resources into fire mitigation and environmental management on its own adjacent lands, tribal lands are left out of this specific initiative's scope and funding. If a fire starts on non-covered land, or if environmental damage occurs there, the resources provided by the EMBER Act won't automatically apply, creating a potential patchwork of management along the border and raising concerns about uneven application of environmental protection efforts.