The GIFT Act of 2025 prohibits hospitals from considering an individual's vaccination status when determining eligibility for organ transplants.
W. Steube
Representative
FL-17
The GIFT Act of 2025 prohibits hospitals and other medical facilities from considering an individual's vaccination status when determining eligibility for organ transplants. This legislation amends the Social Security Act to ensure that vaccination history does not factor into organ allocation decisions. The goal is to guarantee fairness in the transplant process for all patients.
The Guaranteeing Individual Fairness in Transplants Act of 2025, or the GIFT Act, is short, direct, and tackles a major ethical question that has popped up in healthcare recently. In plain English, this bill makes one simple, powerful change: it prohibits hospitals from considering a patient’s vaccination status when deciding who gets an organ transplant.
This isn't just a suggestion; the bill amends Section 1866(a)(1) of the Social Security Act. That’s the section that dictates the rules hospitals must follow to participate in Medicare. If a hospital—including critical access and rural emergency hospitals—wants federal funding through Medicare, they can no longer use whether you got a flu shot, a COVID-19 vaccine, or any other vaccine as a factor in allocating a life-saving organ. The goal is to ensure that access to a new kidney, heart, or liver is based strictly on medical need and suitability, not on personal health choices.
Think about the thousands of people on organ waitlists. For them, every factor used in the allocation decision is literally life or death. Before this bill, some transplant centers had policies that required specific vaccinations (like against COVID-19) as a condition for even being placed on the list or maintaining priority. For a patient who, for whatever reason, chose not to get a particular vaccine, that policy could mean being bypassed for an organ they desperately needed.
The GIFT Act removes that hurdle immediately. For the everyday person waiting on a transplant, this means the only factors that should count are compatibility, urgency, and overall medical prognosis. Your vaccination history is now off the table for the allocation committee. This change promotes fairness, ensuring that a critical medical decision isn't influenced by a criterion many view as unrelated to the organ's success or the patient's long-term health outcome.
While this bill is a clear win for patient equity, it does mean administrative changes for hospitals and transplant centers. These facilities have complex protocols for organ allocation, and this legislation forces them to review and revise those procedures. They have to make sure every part of their process—from initial evaluation to the final decision—doesn't include any reference to vaccination status. If a hospital previously had a mandatory vaccination requirement for their waitlist, they must now scrap it to remain in compliance with Medicare rules.
For the average administrator, this is mostly a paperwork and policy update. However, it also means that the medical teams who might have previously argued that vaccination status impacts post-transplant survival (due to infection risk) must now accept this federal mandate. The bill is clear: whether or not a doctor thinks a vaccine is medically relevant to the outcome, they cannot use it to determine who gets the organ.