PolicyBrief
H.R. 1982
119th CongressMar 10th 2025
Return to Sender Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Return to Sender Act rescinds unobligated balances and repeals the authorizing sections (70002 and 70003) of Public Law 117-169.

Michael Cloud
R

Michael Cloud

Representative

TX-27

LEGISLATION

Return to Sender Act Rescinds Unspent Funds, Wiping Out Legal Authority for Old Programs

The “Return to Sender Act” is a piece of legislative housekeeping that deals entirely with the government’s checkbook. Specifically, it takes two actions against money previously set aside under sections 70002 and 70003 of Public Law 117-169. First, it immediately rescinds—meaning it cancels and takes back—any money that was allocated under those sections but hasn't actually been spent yet (the “unobligated balances”). Second, it completely repeals the original sections 70002 and 70003 themselves, wiping out the legal authority that created those funding streams in the first place.

The Budgetary Clean Sweep

Think of this as the government getting rid of old gift cards that were never used and then closing the account that issued them. This move is purely procedural, focused on cleaning up the federal budget by eliminating authorized but unused spending capacity. For the U.S. Treasury, this means recovering those unspent funds, which then go back into the general operating budget. It’s a win for fiscal control, reducing the total amount of money authorized for spending by the government.

Who Feels the Pinch?

Because this bill is narrowly focused on two specific sections of a past public law, its impact is highly targeted. The people who will feel this change aren't the general public, but rather the specific programs, agencies, or recipients who were planning on using the unobligated funds from those two repealed sections. We don’t know what those programs were from the text of this bill, but whatever they were, their funding tap has been shut off permanently, not just for the current balance but for any future funding under that specific authority. If, for example, section 70002 was setting aside money for a rural broadband initiative that hadn't finished its contracting process, that money is now gone, and the legal basis to fund it that way is also repealed. For those relying on that money, this is a significant setback, even if it’s just a technical cleanup for the budget as a whole.