PolicyBrief
H.R. 1957
119th CongressMar 6th 2025
End Veteran Homelessness Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The End Veteran Homelessness Act of 2025 aims to prioritize case management for vulnerable homeless veterans, expand and clarify rules for the HUD-VASH rental assistance program, and mandate detailed annual reporting on program effectiveness and staffing.

Mark Takano
D

Mark Takano

Representative

CA-39

LEGISLATION

New Veteran Housing Bill Protects Vets from Eviction Even If They Refuse Case Management

The ‘End Veteran Homelessness Act of 2025’ is primarily focused on tightening up the VA and HUD’s joint program, HUD-VASH, which provides housing vouchers and supportive services to homeless veterans. If you know a veteran struggling with housing stability, this bill is a big deal because it changes who gets services and, more importantly, how those services are delivered.

Prioritizing the Highest Need

One of the biggest shifts is how the VA allocates its limited case management resources (Section 2). The bill mandates that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs must prioritize giving case management services to veterans who are both homeless and have disabilities. Think of it this way: the VA is being told to focus its staff time on the most vulnerable veterans first. This means that while everyone eligible for HUD-VASH still gets the housing voucher, the crucial follow-up support from a VA case manager will be directed toward those with the highest barriers to stability, like severe physical or mental health issues.

The No-Eviction Rule: Housing First, Services Second

This bill introduces a huge protection for veterans receiving rental assistance (Section 3). Often, housing programs require participation in services, but this bill separates the two. If a veteran gets a HUD-VASH voucher and initially says ‘no thanks’ to case management, they cannot lose their rental assistance or be evicted by the property owner solely for that refusal. This is a ‘housing first’ approach that prioritizes keeping a roof over their head, even if they aren't ready to engage with the VA services right away. The VA is still required to keep trying to connect with that veteran to build trust and encourage participation later on.

This change acknowledges a real-world problem: sometimes veterans are wary of government services or need time to stabilize before they can tackle complex issues with a case manager. For the veteran who just needs a safe place to sleep for six months before they can focus on their mental health, this provision offers critical breathing room.

Expanding the Safety Net

Section 3 also expands who can get the HUD-VASH rental assistance. Previously, it was mostly focused on the chronically homeless. Now, the VA Secretary has the authority to provide rental assistance to veterans who are considered ‘at risk’ of becoming homeless or even veterans already getting other housing help if the VA determines a HUD-VASH voucher is a ‘better fit’ for their long-term stability. This allows the program to be used proactively, catching veterans before they fall into homelessness, which is always more cost-effective and humane.

Turning on the Transparency Floodlights

If you like government accountability, you'll appreciate Sections 2 and 4. The bill requires a massive increase in reporting. The VA and HUD must now provide Congress with a detailed annual report on the HUD-VASH program, breaking down everything by location and demographics (Section 2). This report has to cover staffing ratios, case manager qualifications, how many vouchers were used versus unused, and any roadblocks veterans faced in leasing units.

On top of that, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has one year to conduct a sweeping, one-time report (Section 4). This GAO report must analyze the quality of case management, the difficulty of hiring and retaining case managers, and detailed metrics on how long veterans stay housed when using these federal programs. The goal here is to give Congress the data needed to see exactly what’s working, where the money is going, and where the program is failing. For instance, if the report shows that case managers in rural areas are overloaded, it provides the evidence needed to fix the staffing problem.