This Act prohibits the Federal Reserve from directly or indirectly issuing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) and bars the Fed from developing or using one for monetary policy without explicit Congressional authorization.
Tom Emmer
Representative
MN-6
The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act strictly prohibits the Federal Reserve from directly or indirectly issuing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) to individuals. This legislation prevents the Fed from developing, testing, or implementing any digital currency that functions as a direct liability of the Federal Reserve. Furthermore, Congress asserts that any authority to create such a digital asset must explicitly come from Congress itself.
| Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Democrat | 212 | 2 | 210 | 0 |
Republican | 220 | 217 | 0 | 3 |
The aptly named “Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act” comes straight out of the gate with a mission: to put a hard stop on the Federal Reserve’s ability to create a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), often called the digital dollar. This legislation doesn't just tap the brakes; it rips out the engine, explicitly prohibiting the Fed from testing, developing, or implementing any CBDC, or anything that acts like one, whether they try to issue it directly or use your local bank as a middleman (SEC. 2, SEC. 3, SEC. 4).
One of the most immediate, practical impacts of this bill is found in Section 2, which states that Federal Reserve banks cannot offer financial products or services directly to individuals, including holding accounts for you or me. Currently, when you use a bank, your money is held by that commercial bank, which is then backed by the Fed. If the Fed were allowed to open accounts for everyone, they would essentially become a massive, government-run competitor to every commercial bank, credit union, and financial institution in the country. This prohibition ensures the existing two-tiered banking system stays intact, meaning your paychecks and savings will continue to be held by private institutions, not the central bank.
At its core, this bill is about future money. A CBDC is defined here as a digital form of the U.S. dollar that is a direct liability of the Federal Reserve and is widely available to the public (SEC. 4). The fear, which drives the bill’s title, is that a government-issued digital currency could allow for unprecedented tracking of individual transactions—think of it as a digital trail where every coffee purchase or rent payment is visible to the central authority. By banning the Fed from creating this tool, the bill aims to protect individual financial privacy before the technology even gets off the ground. For anyone concerned about government surveillance or control over what you can spend, this ban is seen as a major win for financial freedom.
However, the bill isn't a blanket ban on all digital dollars. Section 4 includes a fascinating exception: the restriction doesn’t apply to any dollar-denominated currency that is “open to everyone, doesn't require permission to use, and fully protects the privacy of the user, just like physical coins and paper cash do now.” This clause is a nod to the idea that if a digital dollar could be designed to be truly anonymous and decentralized—like handing over a twenty-dollar bill—then it would be acceptable. The challenge is that creating a digital currency that offers the same level of privacy as physical cash while still being secure and usable in the modern financial system is a massive technical and regulatory hurdle. This exception sets a very high bar, effectively ensuring that the Fed can’t create a digital currency unless it’s perfect on the privacy front.
Beyond just issuing the currency, the legislation also restricts the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) from using a CBDC as a tool for monetary policy. This means they couldn’t use a digital dollar to influence interest rates, manage inflation, or stimulate the economy (SEC. 4). While this might seem abstract, it matters because it limits the Fed’s ability to adapt to a rapidly changing global financial landscape. If other major economies adopt digital currencies, the U.S. central bank might find itself without a modern tool to manage the dollar’s global standing, potentially restricting their options when dealing with future economic crises.