PolicyBrief
H.R. 1915
119th CongressMar 6th 2025
Stop the Cartels Act
IN COMMITTEE

The "Stop the Cartels Act" combats drug and human trafficking by prioritizing intelligence, cutting funds to non-cooperative entities, tightening immigration laws, and modifying substance abuse programs.

Warren Davidson
R

Warren Davidson

Representative

OH-8

LEGISLATION

Stop the Cartels Act: New Border Crackdown, Funding Shifts, and Tighter Asylum Rules

The "Stop the Cartels Act" is a sweeping piece of legislation that tackles everything from drug trafficking and immigration to how we handle substance abuse programs. It's a four-part bill with some big changes proposed, so let's break it down.

Cracking Down on Cartels and Trafficking

The first part of the bill, Title I, focuses on gathering better intelligence about drug and human trafficking organizations. The Director of National Intelligence is tasked with producing reports assessing these threats, and intelligence collection efforts in affected countries will be reviewed to make sure they're focusing on the right things (Section 101). The bill also puts pressure on Mexico by blocking funds for combating drug trafficking until the Secretary of State certifies that Mexico has removed all barriers to bilateral cooperation created after December 2020 (Section 103). Certain drug cartels could also be designated as "Special Transnational Criminal Organizations," opening them up to stricter legal and financial consequences (Section 105).

Real-World Example: Imagine a small business owner near the border constantly dealing with the fallout of cartel activity. This part of the bill aims to provide more resources and focus to directly address that threat.

No Federal Funds for "Sanctuary Cities"

Title II takes aim at "sanctuary cities" and states. It says that any state or local government that doesn't comply with federal immigration laws, specifically section 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, or limits cooperation with federal immigration detainers, will lose federal grant money (Section 201). The Secretary of Homeland Security will be responsible for identifying these non-compliant jurisdictions each year (Section 201).

Real-World Impact: This could mean cuts to local programs and services in cities and states that choose not to fully cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.

Tightening Asylum Rules and Immigration Enforcement

Title III makes significant changes to immigration laws. It gives the Department of Homeland Security more power over the detention of alien minors and families, prioritizes their removal, and limits judicial oversight (Section 301). It also raises the bar for asylum seekers, requiring officers to determine if it's "more likely than not" that their claims are true (Section 311). Certain individuals, like those with felony convictions or those who could seek refuge in other countries with processing centers, would be ineligible for asylum (Section 312). The bill also calls for more immigration judges and staff to speed up processing (Section 321) and mandates the creation of refugee processing centers outside the U.S., in Mexico and Central America (Section 331).

Real-World Example: For a family fleeing violence and seeking asylum, this could mean a much tougher path to proving their case and a higher chance of being detained or deported.

Shaking Up Substance Abuse Programs

Finally, Title IV reauthorizes and reshuffles federal programs for substance abuse. It boosts funding for Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grants, increasing the annual amount to $3,961,600,000 through 2029 (Section 401). But, it also eliminates funding for programs like the Drug-Free Communities Support Program and Community Mental Health Services Block Grant (Section 402). Project AWARE and the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics Expansion Grants program would be phased out by the end of fiscal year 2025 (Section 402).

Real-World Impact: While states get more money overall for substance abuse programs, some community-based mental health and drug prevention initiatives might lose funding, potentially creating gaps in services.