PolicyBrief
H.R. 1910
119th CongressMar 6th 2025
Chief Risk Officer Enforcement and Accountability Act
IN COMMITTEE

The "Chief Risk Officer Enforcement and Accountability Act" enhances risk management in financial companies by mandating experienced chief risk officers with specific responsibilities and reporting requirements, and by directing regulatory agencies to issue related regulations for certain banks.

Sean Casten
D

Sean Casten

Representative

IL-6

LEGISLATION

New Bill Forces Big Banks to Take Risk Seriously: 24-Hour Deadline to Report Key Vacancies

The "Chief Risk Officer Enforcement and Accountability Act" is all about making sure big financial institutions have a dedicated expert—a Chief Risk Officer (CRO)—whose sole job is to spot and manage risks. Think of it like this: if a company's CEO is the captain steering the ship, the CRO is the person in the crow's nest watching out for icebergs. And this bill makes sure that the person in the crow's nest actually knows what they're doing and has the power to do something about it.

Eyes on the Horizon

This bill amends Section 165(h) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, and lays out some pretty specific requirements. First, the CRO has to be someone with real experience identifying and handling risks in large financial firms. They can't just promote the CEO's golf buddy. The CRO is responsible for setting risk limits, implementing policies, developing systems to identify and report risks (including "emerging risks" – basically, the stuff nobody's seen coming yet), and making sure someone is actually responsible for managing risk. (Section 2).

For example, imagine a bank making a bunch of risky loans to, say, underwater basket weavers. The CRO's job is to flag that and say, "Whoa, this could sink us if the underwater basket market crashes." It's about preventing the kind of reckless behavior that can lead to a financial meltdown. They are also tasked with ensuring the independence of the risk-management function and integrating risk management with company goals and compensation structures.

Direct Line to the Top

The CRO reports directly to both the risk committee and the CEO, and they're required to report and resolve any risk-management deficiencies. This is crucial because it means the CRO can't be easily ignored or overruled by someone more focused on short-term profits. It's like having a safety inspector who can shut down a construction site if they see something dangerous, even if the foreman is pushing to keep working.

The bill also tackles what happens when a CRO leaves. Companies have to notify regulators within 24 hours of a vacancy and submit a plan within 7 days to fill the position. If it takes longer than 60 days, the company has to notify the public, and their total assets are frozen at the level they were on the date of the vacancy, until they find a replacement. That's a serious incentive to find a qualified CRO quickly! (Section 2). Finally, the bill directs financial regulatory agencies to issue regulations requiring banks without a holding company and with total consolidated assets of not less than $50,000,000,000 to establish a risk committee and appoint a CRO.

Real-World Stakes

This isn't just about shuffling paperwork. It's about protecting the financial system—and by extension, all of us—from the kind of catastrophic failures we've seen in the past. By requiring experienced CROs, giving them real authority, and ensuring quick replacements, the bill aims to make sure someone is always watching out for the next big risk, before it's too late.