PolicyBrief
H.R. 1902
119th CongressMar 6th 2025
Helping Emergency Responders Overcome Act
IN COMMITTEE

The HERO Act establishes a national data system for tracking public safety officer suicides, funds peer-support mental health programs for fire and EMS personnel, supports wellness programs for healthcare providers, and develops educational resources and best practices for treating first responder mental health issues.

Ami Bera
D

Ami Bera

Representative

CA-6

LEGISLATION

HERO Act Mandates National Tracking of First Responder Suicides, Funds Peer Support Programs

The Helping Emergency Responders Overcome Act, or the HERO Act, tackles a silent crisis: the high rate of suicide and mental health challenges facing police, firefighters, EMTs, and 911 dispatchers. This bill sets up the framework for a national data system to track these suicides while simultaneously funding mental health support programs for those on the front lines.

The Data Dilemma: Counting the Cost of Service

Section 2 of the HERO Act aims to create the Public Safety Officer Suicide Reporting System, a national mechanism to track suicides among public safety officers. This isn't just about raw numbers; the data must be broken down by age, gender, state, and—crucially—by their role (career, paid-on-call, or volunteer). For the first time, we’d have a clear, national picture of where the crisis is hitting hardest. This is essential for anyone trying to allocate resources effectively, whether you run a small volunteer fire department or manage a large city police force.

Here’s the massive safeguard built into this section: the data collected cannot be used to deny life insurance payments or other benefits to the officer’s survivors. This is a critical protection (Section 2, “Stopping Benefit Denials”), ensuring families who have already suffered a loss aren't penalized by the very system designed to help.

Funding the Front Lines: Peer Support Grants

The bill understands that sometimes, the best help comes from someone who has walked in your boots. Sections 3 and 4 establish grant programs to fund behavioral health and wellness programs. Section 3 focuses specifically on fire departments and EMS agencies, allowing them to use federal grants to set up or expand peer-support programs. This means a career firefighter struggling with trauma can talk confidentially to a trained peer who understands the job’s specific stressors, rather than navigating an outside mental health system that might not get it.

Section 4 extends similar grant opportunities to hospitals and healthcare facilities—including critical access and disproportionate share hospitals—to set up behavioral health programs for their staff. For the nurse working 12-hour shifts or the small-town EMT, these grants mean their employer can afford to offer confidential counseling and peer training, turning high-stress workplaces into places where mental health is actually supported.

Specialized Training for Specialized Trauma

It’s one thing to see a therapist; it’s another thing to see one who understands the unique culture and trauma associated with public safety work. Section 5 and 6 address this gap by requiring the government to develop and publish specialized educational materials and best practices. These resources will be used to train mental health professionals on the unique stressors faced by firefighters, police, EMS personnel, and 911 telecommunicators—including the difficulties faced by retirees.

This is a huge win for the average officer. It means that when they finally seek help, they are more likely to find a clinician who understands the difference between a critical incident stress debriefing and standard therapy, and who doesn't need a 30-minute explanation of what it’s like to run into a burning building or be the voice on the other end of a fatal 911 call. The goal is better, more effective treatment based on evidence.

Potential Roadblocks

While the bill is overwhelmingly positive, there is one detail worth noting. Section 2 states the Secretary of HHS may set up the national suicide reporting system, rather than shall. This use of discretionary language means the speed and priority of establishing this vital data collection system could be subject to administrative discretion, potentially delaying the creation of the comprehensive data needed to drive effective prevention strategies.