PolicyBrief
H.R. 1862
119th CongressMar 5th 2025
English Language Unity Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "English Language Unity Act of 2025" establishes English as the official language of the U.S., standardizes English tests for naturalization, and creates a "National English Language Day."

Marjorie Greene
R

Marjorie Greene

Representative

GA-14

LEGISLATION

Proposed 'English Language Unity Act of 2025' Aims to Make English Official U.S. Language, Overhauls Citizenship Test

The 'English Language Unity Act of 2025' proposes a significant shift in how the U.S. government operates by formally declaring English the nation's official language. This bill, if enacted, would amend Title 4 of the U.S. Code, mandating that all official federal government functions be conducted in English. This includes laws, regulations, publications, and even naturalization ceremonies. The changes are slated to take effect 180 days after the Act's passage, with the Secretary of Homeland Security tasked to roll out new, standardized English language tests for citizenship applicants within the same timeframe.

The Official Word: English Takes Center Stage

Under Section 3 of the bill, federal government representatives would be tasked with preserving and enhancing English's role. The term 'official' functions is broadly defined, covering most binding government actions, from policy creation to public orders. Imagine trying to understand new tax regulations or public health guidance – this bill means the primary, official version of such documents would have to be in English. While the bill states it doesn't prohibit unofficial communication in other languages (Section 3, §165), the emphasis on English for all 'official' business could create hurdles. For instance, if you or a family member primarily speak Spanish or Vietnamese, accessing vital government services or understanding your rights from an official document might become more challenging if translated versions aren't readily available or considered 'official.'

There are some exceptions listed in Section 3 (§163). These include materials for teaching languages, requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, actions related to national security or international trade, public health and safety protections, Census Bureau activities, and protecting crime victims or defendants. The use of Native Alaskan or Native American languages also isn't limited by this bill (Section 3, §165).

The New Path to Citizenship: Reading the Fine Print

For those aspiring to become U.S. citizens, this bill introduces stricter English language requirements. Section 3 (§164) mandates that naturalization applicants must be able to read and understand the English text of foundational U.S. documents like the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and federal laws. Furthermore, all naturalization ceremonies would be conducted exclusively in English. The Secretary of Homeland Security is directed by Section 5 to develop a standardized English language test based on this new, higher bar of comprehension for complex legal and historical texts. This could mean a tougher road to citizenship for many, particularly older immigrants or those with limited access to advanced English language education, who might be able to converse in English but struggle with dense, formal texts.

Broader Strokes: Legal Interpretations and National Recognition

Beyond official government functions and citizenship, Section 4 of the Act seeks to influence how English language requirements are interpreted more broadly, suggesting that workplace policies in both public and private sectors should generally align with U.S. laws, and that unclear English texts in laws should be interpreted to uphold rights outlined in the Bill of Rights. The bill also proposes, in Section 6, the establishment of a 'National English Language Day,' requiring a presidential proclamation to recognize the language's importance. While the bill states it doesn't discourage learning other languages (Section 3, §165), the collective weight of these provisions points towards a significant push for English primacy. The practical effect could be a reduction in multilingual resources and support systems, potentially impacting community centers that help non-English speakers navigate government processes or businesses that rely on multilingual workforces and customer bases.