The "Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act" expands Medicare eligibility for rural emergency hospitals to include certain facilities that closed between 2014 and 2020, with modified payment rules for those near existing hospitals.
Jodey Arrington
Representative
TX-19
The "Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act" broadens the definition of "rural emergency hospital" under Medicare, enabling certain previously closed rural hospitals to re-qualify. Effective January 1, 2027, it allows facilities that ceased operations between 2014 and 2020 to become rural emergency hospitals. It also modifies payment rules, specifying that increased payments will not apply to facilities located less than 35 miles from the nearest hospital.
The "Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act" aims to throw a lifeline to some previously shuttered rural hospitals by letting them re-qualify as "rural emergency hospitals" under Medicare. Here’s the deal: if a facility used to be a critical access hospital or a certain type of rural hospital and closed down between January 1, 2014, and December 26, 2020, it might get a second shot at life, starting January 1, 2027 (SEC. 2).
The main idea here is to get emergency medical services back into rural areas that have lost their hospitals. Think about it: if you're a farmer with a tractor injury, or a family dealing with a sudden illness, having a nearby hospital can make a huge difference. This bill could help reopen doors and bring back those vital services.
Now, here's where it gets a bit tricky. The bill tweaks the payment rules (Section 1834(x) of the Social Security Act). While some rural emergency hospitals get a bump in Medicare payments, there's a catch: if you're less than 35 miles away from another hospital, you're out of luck for the extra cash (section 1861(kkk)(3)(B)). This could mean that some rural communities, might see their hospital reopen, but they won't get the same financial boost as others. So, while it helps some, it could create a bit of a divide in who gets the most support.
Imagine a small-town hospital that closed in 2016 because it couldn't make ends meet. Under this bill, it could potentially reopen as a "rural emergency hospital" and start receiving Medicare payments again. That's a win for the town, the local workers, and anyone needing emergency care. But, if that same hospital is 30 miles from a bigger facility, it will reopen and not get the increased payments.
This bill is a mixed bag. It's trying to fix a real problem – the loss of rural hospitals – and that could be a big deal for folks in those areas. But the 35-mile rule creates winners and losers, and it's worth watching how that plays out. It's definitely a step towards addressing a critical need, but the details matter, especially when it comes to who gets what kind of support.