The "Stop Electronic Stalking Act of 2025" amends federal stalking laws to include the unauthorized use of electronic geotracking devices to track someone's location without their consent.
Emilia Sykes
Representative
OH-13
The Stop Electronic Stalking Act of 2025 amends federal stalking laws to include the use of unauthorized geotracking devices. This bill defines a geotracking device as any electronic or mechanical tool used to remotely monitor a person's location without their consent. By including this, the law aims to modernize stalking definitions to address technological advancements.
The Stop Electronic Stalking Act of 2025 directly updates federal law to tackle the misuse of technology for stalking. Specifically, this bill amends Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 2261A, to include the use of an unauthorized "geotracking device" in the definition of stalking. This means using any electronic or mechanical device to remotely track someone's location or movements without their permission is now legally considered stalking.
This act defines a "geotracking device" broadly, covering any tech used to remotely monitor someone's location. The key here is unauthorized use—meaning the person being tracked hasn't agreed to it or has withdrawn their consent (Section 2). Think of a jealous partner slipping an AirTag into someone's bag without their knowledge, or a suspicious boss tracking an employee’s company car on their personal time, without explicit and informed consent. These scenarios, which used to exist in a legal gray area, are now clearly addressed.
For everyday folks, this means stronger legal protection against being tracked without your knowledge or consent. Imagine a situation where someone finds a tracking device hidden in their belongings. Under this new act, that's a clear violation of federal law, offering a more defined path to legal recourse.
While the bill aims to protect individuals, there could be some bumps in the road. For instance, the definition of "geotracking device" might be too broad, potentially roping in devices used for legitimate purposes. It might be tricky to prove unauthorized tracking in some cases, especially if the technology is discreet or the tracking is intermittent. However, the core idea is clear: your location is your business, and tracking it without consent is a no-go.