The "Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act" increases penalties for Social Security fraud, identification document fraud, and COVID-19 relief fraud by making individuals who commit these crimes inadmissible to the U.S. and deportable.
Tom McClintock
Representative
CA-5
The "Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act" increases penalties for Social Security fraud, identification document fraud, and fraud related to COVID-19 relief programs. It makes individuals inadmissible to the U.S. and deportable if they have been convicted of, admit to, or admit to actions that constitute these offenses, including conspiracy to commit such offenses.
This new bill, called the "Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act," significantly expands the reasons someone can be barred from entering or deported from the U.S. It goes beyond just convictions, now including anyone who admits to actions that could be considered Social Security fraud, identification document fraud, or, crucially, "covered COVID offenses."
This is where things get tricky. "Covered COVID offenses" specifically target fraud related to pandemic relief programs. We're talking about loans under the Small Business Act (sections 7(a)(36), 7(a)(37), and 7(b)) and grants from the American Rescue Plan Act (Section 5003) or the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act (Section 324). Basically, if you got certain types of COVID-related financial help, any misstep in your application – even an unintentional one, by their definition – could now be grounds for deportation.
What's particularly concerning is the wording. It's not just about convictions. The bill states that admitting to actions that constitute the elements of these offenses is enough. Think about it: many of these applications were complex, and people were scrambling. A small business owner, rushing to keep their doors open, might have misunderstood a question on a form or made a minor error in calculating their losses. Under this bill, if they admit to that mistake – even without any intent to defraud – it could be used against them.
Imagine a restaurant owner who received a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan. If they later realize they made a small mistake on their application and, in the interest of honesty, try to correct it, that admission could potentially trigger deportation proceedings. Or consider an immigrant, perhaps with limited English proficiency, who struggled to navigate the complicated application process for a grant. A minor error, easily made due to language barriers or confusion, could now have life-altering consequences.
The bill casts a wide net, and the potential for unintended consequences is real. While preventing fraud is important, this law could disproportionately impact immigrant communities, who may be more vulnerable to misunderstandings and less equipped to navigate complex legal challenges. It essentially weaponizes bureaucratic errors, turning honest mistakes into grounds for deportation. The language around "admitting to actions" is particularly vague and open to broad interpretation, raising concerns about fairness and due process. The challenge will be in how this is implemented and whether it will be used to fairly pursue intentional fraud or to punish those who made honest mistakes during a time of unprecedented crisis.