The SCREEN Act restricts U.S. government support for film productions that censor content to appease the Chinese government or Communist Party.
Mark Green
Representative
TN-7
The SCREEN Act aims to prevent the use of U.S. government funds and resources to support film productions that are subject to censorship or alteration at the request of the Chinese government or the Chinese Communist Party. It requires U.S. companies seeking government support for film projects to disclose films submitted to Chinese officials for content review. The Act also mandates an annual report to Congress detailing films potentially altered to appease Chinese government demands, ensuring transparency and accountability in the film industry's engagement with China.
The "Stopping Communist Regimes from Engaging in Edits Now Act," or SCREEN Act, aims to curb Chinese government influence on American film productions. This bill puts new limits on how the U.S. government can support films, especially those seeking access to the Chinese market.
The core of the SCREEN Act is about controlling how U.S. government resources are used in film production. The State Department can only provide technical support or access to its assets if a U.S. film company discloses all films it has submitted to Chinese government or Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials for screening approval in the past 10 years (SEC. 2). That means titles, submission dates – the whole deal. Think of it like this: if a studio wants help filming at a U.S. embassy, they need to show their China report card first.
Furthermore, these companies have to promise, in writing, that they won't change a film's content to please Chinese censors (SEC. 2). This also applies to co-productions with Chinese entities if those come with content strings attached. Basically, the U.S. government doesn't want to be involved in making movies that kowtow to another country's censorship demands.
This isn't just about future projects. The bill requires companies to look back a full decade, meaning a lot of paperwork and potentially awkward conversations about past decisions. For a film student, this is like having to show your professor every project you've ever submitted, not just your current one. For a construction company, it's akin to revealing all past bids, even those altered for specific client demands. This retrospective requirement could be a real headache for studios with extensive catalogs and dealings in China.
Every year, the Secretary of State has to give Congress a detailed report (SEC. 2). This report will list films submitted for Chinese screening, those with promises not to alter content, and, crucially, any films the Secretary believes were altered in the last 3 to 10 years due to Chinese requests. This is where things could get tricky. How do you prove a change was made specifically because of Chinese pressure? It opens the door to a lot of interpretation and potential disputes. Imagine a small business owner having their past contracts publicly scrutinized for any hint of outside influence – it creates a climate of suspicion.
The SCREEN Act could significantly change how Hollywood operates. While the goal might be to protect artistic freedom from foreign influence, the practical effect could be a lot of self-censorship and second-guessing. The bill's broad definitions and reporting requirements could create a chilling effect, making studios think twice before tackling subjects that might offend Chinese censors, even if those subjects are important.