This bill allows citizens to sue federal employees (excluding the President and Vice President) who violate their First Amendment rights, with the possibility of attorney's fees awarded to the prevailing party.
Harriet Hageman
Representative
WY
The First Amendment Accountability Act allows citizens to sue federal employees who violate their First Amendment rights, but prevents federal employees from suing the government for actions related to their employment. Courts can award attorney's fees to the winning party, excluding the United States. The Act defines "federal employee" as any executive branch worker, excluding the President and Vice President.
The First Amendment Accountability Act lets citizens sue federal employees for violating their First Amendment rights. However, it also prevents federal employees from suing the government or their employer for actions taken within their job. The court can award attorney fees to whoever wins the case, as long as it's not the United States. Also, the definition of federal employee is pretty narrow, excluding the President and VP.
This bill gives citizens a direct way to take federal employees to court if they believe their First Amendment rights have been violated. If a park ranger, for example, wrongly prevents a protestor from exercising their right to free speech, that protestor could potentially sue the ranger directly (Section 2). This part is all about making sure individual government workers respect your basic rights.
While citizens get a new pathway to sue, federal employees don't get the same deal. The bill explicitly states that employees can't use this law to sue their bosses or the government itself for things done as part of their job (Section 2). So, if a federal whistleblower feels their free speech is being stifled by their agency, this law wouldn't be a tool they could use.
Here's a twist: if you win your case, the court can make the other side pay your attorney's fees (Section 2). This could make it easier for people to bring legitimate claims. But, and this is important, the U.S. government itself won't be on the hook for those fees if it loses. This could be a double-edged sword. It might encourage citizens to pursue cases, but it also puts a financial burden on individual federal employees.
This law defines "federal employee" in a specific way. It covers most people working in the executive branch, except the President and Vice President (Section 2). So, while a wide range of government workers are covered, the very top officials aren't included in this definition.
Finally, the bill includes a "severability clause" (Section 2). This means that if one part of the law is struck down by the courts, the rest of it still stands. It's a kind of legal safety net to keep the whole thing from collapsing if one piece is challenged.