The "Scientific EXPERT Act of 2025" aims to improve drug development for rare diseases by mandating science-focused meetings and public reporting to enhance collaboration and regulatory flexibility.
Doris Matsui
Representative
CA-7
The Scientific EXPERT Act of 2025 aims to improve drug development for rare diseases by mandating science-focused meetings. These meetings, organized by the Reagan-Udall Foundation, will bring together experts to discuss challenges and opportunities in developing treatments for specific rare diseases. The FDA will participate in these meetings, and meeting outcomes will be published to inform future drug development efforts. The Act allocates funding for these meetings and requires reports to Congress on their impact.
The Scientific EXPERT Act of 2025 is all about speeding up the development of treatments for rare diseases. Instead of just hoping for breakthroughs, this bill makes it mandatory for the FDA to get involved proactively. Here's the breakdown:
The core of the bill [SEC. 2] is setting up regular, science-focused meetings specifically to tackle the challenges of developing drugs for rare diseases. We're not talking about common colds here – these are conditions that affect a small number of people, making research and development tough because the market isn't as lucrative for pharmaceutical companies.
The bill orders the Secretary of Health and Human Services to team up with the Reagan-Udall Foundation (a non-profit focused on FDA modernization) to run at least four of these meetings each year. Each meeting will focus on a different rare disease. Think of it like a series of specialized workshops, each diving deep into a specific condition. A steering committee will guide topic selection, prioritizing unmet needs and areas where regulations can be streamlined. The Foundation is responsible for planning the objectives, agendas, and who gets a seat at the table, in consultation with various stakeholders [SEC. 2].
Within 180 days of each meeting, the Foundation has to publish everything online: a transcript, a recording, and a summary analysis. This summary will highlight areas of agreement, points needing clarification, and any next steps that were decided upon [SEC. 2]. This means the public (and importantly, patients and advocacy groups) get full access to what's being discussed and decided. The Secretary is also required to make public a brief statement on whether any relevant ELSFDD (Externally-Led Patient-Focused Drug Development) meeting was held and how the Secretary incorporated input from such meeting in the risk-benefit assessment. [SEC. 2].
It's not just about talking; the FDA has to be actively involved. The bill requires FDA representatives to participate in every meeting [SEC. 2]. This ensures that the regulators are hearing directly from researchers, patients, and companies, which should, in theory, lead to more informed and efficient decision-making.
To make all this happen, the bill authorizes $1 million per year from 2026 to 2030, specifically for organizing the meetings. Another $1 million per year is authorized for the FDA to take action based on the meeting outcomes [SEC. 2].
Imagine a family dealing with a rare genetic disorder. Currently, they might face years of uncertainty and limited treatment options. This bill aims to change that. By forcing the key players to sit down, share knowledge, and identify roadblocks, the hope is to cut down the time it takes to get effective drugs from the lab to the people who need them. For example, if a researcher is struggling with a specific regulatory hurdle, these meetings could provide a forum to find a solution quickly, rather than getting bogged down in bureaucracy for months or even years.
Finally, the bill requires an annual report to Congress. This report will detail the number and topics of meetings, FDA participation levels, the impact on FDA workload, and how the input received was actually used [SEC. 2]. This is the government's way of keeping tabs on whether this whole initiative is actually working.