PolicyBrief
H.R. 1504
119th CongressFeb 21st 2025
China Trade Relations Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "China Trade Relations Act of 2025" withdraws normal trade relations with China and sets new human rights and trade practice standards for restoring them.

Christopher "Chris" Smith
R

Christopher "Chris" Smith

Representative

NJ-4

LEGISLATION

US-China Trade Status Revoked: New Human Rights and Espionage Rules Kick In

The China Trade Relations Act of 2025 significantly changes the trade relationship between the United States and China. The core of the Act is the withdrawal of "normal trade relations" treatment from China, effective immediately upon enactment. This means that the standard, predictable trade rules that have applied to Chinese goods will no longer be in effect. Think of it like going from a fixed-rate mortgage to an adjustable-rate one overnight – a lot less predictable, and potentially much more expensive.

Trade Relations Overhaul

The Act essentially reverts the US-China trade relationship to its pre-World Trade Organization (WTO) status. Reinstating normal trade relations now hinges on a much broader set of conditions than before. Section 3 of the bill expands the grounds for China's ineligibility, tying trade status to a range of human rights, labor, and economic practices. For example, if the President determines that China is violating human rights, failing to uphold labor standards (including those of the International Labour Organization), operating concentration camps, harassing PRC nationals abroad, failing to protect Tibet's heritage, or engaging in economic espionage against the U.S. (including IP theft), normal trade relations can be denied. This is a big deal, covering everything from forced labor concerns to intellectual property protection.

Real-World Examples

  • A US-based tech company: If the company has evidence that a Chinese firm stole its designs, this Act provides a mechanism to potentially block imports from that firm or even the entire country, depending on the government's assessment.
  • A clothing retailer: If the retailer sources products from China, they may face higher tariffs or import restrictions if China is found to be non-compliant with the Act's labor standards, potentially increasing costs for consumers.
  • An American consumer: If you are buying a T-shirt, and it was made with forced labor, this could prevent that T-shirt from ever entering the country.

The President's Role (and Congress's Check)

The President has a key role. Before China can regain normal trade status, the President must submit a report to Congress certifying that China is not violating any of the specified conditions (Section 3). These reports are required twice a year (June 30 and December 31) as long as favorable trade treatment is in place. The President can waive these restrictions for 12 months at a time via Executive Order, but only if they determine it will "promote the objectives" of the section and have received "assurances" of improved Chinese practices. Congress, however, can terminate these extensions through a joint resolution of disapproval, providing a check on Presidential power.

Potential Challenges

While the Act aims to address serious concerns, there are practical challenges. The broad definitions of violations (like "systematic economic espionage") could be subject to interpretation. Moreover, the Act's effectiveness hinges on consistent Presidential enforcement and Congressional oversight. It also raises the possibility of retaliatory trade measures from China, impacting U.S. businesses and consumers. The Act represents a significant shift in US-China trade policy, with potentially far-reaching consequences for both economies and the global trade landscape.