Cameron's Law incentivizes pharmaceutical companies to develop treatments for rare diseases by increasing the orphan drug tax credit from 25% to 50%.
Josh Gottheimer
Representative
NJ-5
Cameron's Law amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the orphan drug tax credit from 25% to 50%. This change aims to incentivize the development of treatments for rare diseases by offering greater financial support to companies through enhanced tax benefits. The adjusted tax credit will be effective for taxable years starting after the enactment of this law.
Cameron's Law (H.R. ll) aims to boost the development of treatments for rare diseases by restoring a significant tax break for pharmaceutical companies. The bill directly amends Section 45C(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, raising the tax credit for qualified clinical testing expenses from 25% back to 50%. This change takes effect for taxable years starting after the bill becomes law.
The core of Cameron's Law is all about making it more financially attractive for companies to invest in researching and developing drugs for rare diseases, often called "orphan drugs." By bumping the tax credit back up to 50%, companies can deduct a larger portion of their research costs, which can be substantial. For example, if a company spends $10 million on eligible research, they could potentially reduce their tax liability by $5 million under this restored credit, compared to $2.5 million under the current 25% rate.
This change could mean more investment in treatments for conditions that affect a relatively small number of people, conditions that might not otherwise get much attention from drug developers. Imagine a small biotech firm specializing in genetic disorders; this tax credit could be the difference between pursuing a promising new therapy and shelving it due to cost concerns. Or think of a family dealing with a rare, debilitating condition – this bill could increase the chances of a treatment becoming available in the future.
While the goal is to spur innovation, it's worth noting that restoring this tax credit will have a direct impact on government revenue. Fewer taxes collected from pharmaceutical companies mean less money available for other government programs. There's also the possibility, that some companies might try to game the system, potentially inflating research costs or focusing on drugs that barely qualify as "orphan" to take advantage of the larger tax break. It will be important to monitor how this plays out to make sure the incentive leads to genuine advances in treating rare diseases, not just bigger tax write-offs.