This bill establishes a grant program and advisory board to implement mental health screenings and referrals for individuals entering and exiting detention centers, with the goal of improving mental healthcare, reducing crime, and increasing employment opportunities.
Mikie Sherrill
Representative
NJ-11
The "Improving Mental Healthcare in the Re-Entry System Act of 2025" aims to improve mental healthcare for individuals re-entering society after incarceration by establishing grant programs for mental health screenings and referrals at detention centers. An Advisory Board will oversee program implementation, evaluate program effectiveness, and provide technical assistance. The act also directs the Bureau of Prisons to create a similar mental health screening program. Finally, the act allocates funding for these initiatives and defines key terms.
The "Improving Mental Healthcare in the Re-Entry System Act of 2025" tackles a huge problem: the lack of mental health support for people leaving jail or prison. This bill, if passed, would set up a system to screen people for mental health issues before they're released and connect them with help. It's all about making sure folks have a fighting chance at a stable life on the outside.
The core of the bill is a grant program (starting within 90 days of the Act's passage) that funds mental health screenings in jails and prisons. The idea is to catch serious conditions like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression early using a short, 5-10 question survey based on the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) (SEC. 2). Think of it like a quick check-up to flag anyone who might need more support. If the survey suggests someone needs help, an outreach team steps in. This team – including mental healthcare pros, clinicians, and a dedicated "mental health liaison" – is supposed to connect the individual with local mental healthcare providers before they even leave the facility (SEC. 2). If they can't reach them in person, they'll try by phone within 24-48 hours of release, and even make house calls if necessary (SEC. 2).
This isn't just about throwing money at the problem. The bill sets up an Advisory Board (within 60 days of the Act; SEC. 4) to keep things on track. This board, made up of experts in mental health and criminal justice, will review plans from states and localities, make sure the money is being spent wisely, and offer guidance. They'll also be working with independent researchers to evaluate how well the program is actually working (SEC. 5). We're talking hard data on things like arrests, employment, and whether people are actually using the mental health services they're referred to. The evaluations will track these outcomes for one, three, five, and even ten years after someone completes the program (SEC. 5). This long-term view is crucial for understanding the real impact.
Imagine a construction worker, just released after a short stint, who's been struggling with undiagnosed bipolar disorder. Under this bill, they'd get screened, flagged as potentially needing help, and connected with a local clinic before they even walk out the door. This could mean the difference between getting back on their feet and ending up back behind bars. Or consider a young adult with schizophrenia who's been in and out of jail. This program could provide the consistent support they need to manage their condition, find stable housing, and maybe even land a job. The bill authorizes a lot of money to make this happen: $100 million in 2026, ramping up to $140 million by 2030 (SEC. 6). That funding is split between the Bureau of Prisons (20%), states (20%), and localities (50%), with the rest going to evaluations and the Advisory Board (SEC. 6). The Bureau of Prisons is also directed to create a similar mental health screening program within 90 days of the Act's enactment (SEC. 3).
This bill acknowledges that mental health is a critical piece of the puzzle when it comes to successful re-entry. By providing early intervention and connecting people with resources, it aims to break the cycle of recidivism and give folks a real shot at a second chance. It’s a practical approach that could make a significant difference in people’s lives, and the built-in evaluations mean we’ll actually know if it’s working.