PolicyBrief
H.R. 1382
119th CongressFeb 26th 2025
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with respect to San Francisco Bay restoration, and for other purposes.
AWAITING HOUSE

This bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to fund San Francisco Bay restoration projects, activities, and studies, with a limit on federal funding and restrictions on entities connected to foreign countries of concern. It also allows federal agencies to use funds from interagency agreements for restoration activities.

Jared Huffman
D

Jared Huffman

Representative

CA-2

LEGISLATION

San Francisco Bay Gets a Boost: New Bill Funds Restoration, Limits Foreign Ties

This bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to kickstart a San Francisco Bay restoration program. It greenlights the Director to fund a range of projects, activities, and studies that make it onto the annual priority list. Think of it as a targeted investment in the Bay's health, managed through agreements with a mix of players—federal, state, and local agencies, special districts, and even public or private entities, including the Estuary Partnership.

Cash and Collaboration

The bill sets up how the money flows. Federal funding for non-federal entities is capped at 75% of the total project cost. The other 25%? It must come from non-federal sources. This matching requirement ensures local buy-in and shared investment in the restoration work. A potential challenge is the additional administrative oversight that may be needed to track and verify project costs.

Who's In, Who's Out?

There's a clear restriction: no federal funds for non-federal entities with connections to a "foreign country of concern." While the bill doesn't define "foreign country of concern," leaving room for interpretation that might shift with political winds, the intent is to keep the focus (and the funding) on domestic partners. The bill also gives federal agencies flexibility, allowing them to tap into funds from interagency agreements to get things done.

Real-World Ripple Effects

For folks living and working around the Bay, this could mean a lot. For example, a local nonprofit working on wetland restoration could get a significant funding boost, enabling them to expand their efforts. Or, a public agency could tackle a long-delayed project to improve water quality, directly benefiting local fisheries and recreational areas. The requirement for non-federal matching funds means that local communities and organizations have a direct stake in these projects. The interagency agreement clause could streamline project approvals and reduce bureaucratic delays, potentially accelerating improvements.

This is a mixed bag. It's good news for anyone who values a healthier San Francisco Bay, from environmental groups to businesses that rely on clean water. The emphasis on collaboration and local participation could lead to more effective and sustainable restoration efforts. However, the restriction on foreign-connected entities, while understandable, adds a layer of complexity, and the reliance on interagency agreements will require careful oversight to avoid any unintended consequences.